Anyone who has ever fallen in love will tell you it's the little things about the other person that matter. The silly in-jokes shared at the end of the day. The peculiarities of the other person's morning coffee ritual. The way he or she lets old paperbacks stack up on the bedside table. Such interrelated details come to define us. They trace the undercurrents of our personality, and, to the observant and loving eye, they illuminate true beauty.

In the eyes of some, there is no finer beauty than that found in mathematics. They look at the world of numbers and, just as you'd never define your human beloved solely by his or her profession or hair color, the math lover sees beyond the mere function of numbers. The likes of 6, 28 and 496 turn into something more sublime than simple carriers of information. Independent of their usage, numbers become fascinating entities, and their mathematical relationships express the complexity of a vast system underpinning nature itself.

The study of those sometimes subtle and far-reaching relationships is **number theory**, sometimes referred to as **higher arithmetic**. Number theorists scrutinize the properties of **integers**, the natural numbers you know as -1, -2, 0, 1, 2 and so forth. It's part theoretical and part experimental, as mathematicians seek to discover fascinating and even unexpected mathematical interactions.

What kind of relationships? Well, we actually categorize integers into different number types based on their relationships. There are, of course, **odd numbers** (1,3, 5 … ), which cannot be divided evenly, and **even numbers** (2, 4, 6 … ), which can. There are **square numbers**, produced by multiplying another number by itself. For instance, 2 x 2 = 4 and 3 x 3 = 9, so 4 and 9 are both square numbers. So is 1 (1 x 1 = 1) and so is 9,801 (99 x 99 = 9,801). We also express these four examples as 2^{2}, 3^{2}, 1^{2} and 99^{2}.

Now let's add another level of intrigue to this example. In some cases, we can add square numbers together to produce other squared numbers in what is called a **Pythagorean triple**, as they fit the **Pythagorean theorem** (a^{2} + b^{2} = c^{2}). An example of this is 3^{2} + 4^{2} = 5^{2}, or 3, 4, 5.

Number theory involves analyzing such mathematical relationships, as well as asking new questions about them. But just what is a theory of numbers? What goes into formulating a proof, and why do some mathematical questions remain unanswered for centuries?

## Questions in Number Theory

So, the world of math offers up numerous number types, each with its own particular properties. Mathematicians formulate theories about the relationships between numbers and number groups. They uphold their theories with **axioms** (previously established statements presumed to be true) and **theorems** (statements based on other theorems or axioms).

The first step in building a shiny, new, mathematical theory, however, is asking a theoretical question about number relationships. For example, can the sum of two cubes be a cube? Remember the Pythagorean triples from the previous page? These trios of three numbers, such as (3, 4, 5), solve the equation a^{2} + b^{2} = c^{2}. But what about a^{3} + b^{3} = c^{3}? Mathematician Pierre de Fermat asked the same question about cubes and, in 1637, he claimed to have worked out a mathematical **proof** that, via line after line of painstaking logic, showed beyond any doubt that no, the sum of two cubes can't be a cube. We call this **Fermat's Last Theorem**. Unfortunately, instead of providing the full proof in his notes, Fermat merely wrote, "I have a truly marvelous demonstration of this proposition which this margin is too narrow to contain" [source: NOVA].

More than three and a half centuries followed during which mathematicians around the world tried in vain to rediscover Fermat's proof. What was riding on this quest? Nothing, save academic pride and the love of pure, abstract mathematics. Then in 1993, with the aid of computational math undiscovered in Fermat's time, English mathematician Andrew Wiles succeeded in proving the 356-year-old theorem. Experts continue to dispute whether Fermat actually worked out such a phenomenal proof in his pre-computer age, or if he was mistaken.

Other questions in number theory related to various perceived or theoretical patterns in numbers or number groups. It all begins with that most crucial aspect of intelligent thought: pattern recognition. Brown University mathematics professor Joseph H. Silverman lays out five basic steps in number theory:

- Accumulate mathematical or abstract data.
- Examine the data and search for patterns or relationships.
- Formulate a
**conjecture**(typically in the form of an equation) to explain these patterns or relationships. - Test the conjecture with additional data.
- Devise a proof showing the conjecture to be correct. The proof should start with known facts and end with the desired result.

Fermat's Last Theorem, therefore, was really a conjecture for 356 years and only became a true theorem in 1993. Others, such as Euclid's Proof of Infinite Primes (which proves that prime numbers are limitless), has remained a solid model of mathematical reasoning since 300 B.C. Still other number theory conjectures, both old and new, remain unproofed.

Numbers are as infinite as human understanding is finite, so number theory and its various subfields will continue to captivate the minds of math lovers for ages. Old problems may fall, but new and more complicated conjectures will rise.

Explore the links on the next page for more information on mathematics.

UP NEXT

**Up Next**

## How Chaos Theory Works

Chaos theory is the idea that the ordered, obsequious universe we take for granted may be the exception to the rule. Learn more about chaos theory.

### Related Articles

**Sources**

- LeVeque, William J. "Elementary Theory of Numbers." Dover Publications, Inc. 1990.
- Silverman, Joseph H. "A Friendly Introduction to Number Theory." 1997. Prentice Hall.
- "Solving Fermat: Andrew Wiles." NOVA Online. November 2000. (June 9, 2011) http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/proof/wiles.html

Follow us

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

Pinterest