3rd frame:
From
Hunter's perspective, nothing new has happened. He remained in his
initial frame of reference and John returned at the same velocity he
left with. Therefore, Hunter measured the return trip to take 15 hours
for his frame (same as the outgoing trip) and observes the trip to take
12 hours for John. From John's perspective, he encountered a major
change. He actually changed frames from one of traveling out to one of
traveling back. Now, at the start of the return trip, when John looks
at his clocks, he observes his clock to read 12 hours and Hunter's
clock to read 20.4 hours. Think about this. John now shows that
Hunter's clock has jumped ahead from 9.6 hours to 20.4 hours. How can
this be???? When John changed from the 2nd frame to the 3rd frame, the
established symmetry between Hunter and John was broken. Thus, each
views their own time as having no change. And since John was the one
that actually changed frames, he showed more elapsed time for Hunter.
From here on out, it is business as usual. The return trip is clocked
at 12 hours by John, but he observes 9.6 hours for Hunter. Again, let's
clean this up…
3rd frame totals:
Hunter
measures his time to be 15 hours, but he measures John's time to be 12
hours. John measures his time to be 12 hours, but he measures Hunter's
time to be 9.6 hours. Remember, this 9.6 is only for the return trip
after the frame change.
Trip totals:
Hunter measured his time to be 15 hours for the outgoing trip + 15 hours for the return trip…30 hours.
Hunter observed John's time to be 12 hours outgoing + 12 hours return …24 hours.
John measured his time to be 12 hours outgoing + 12 hours return…24 hours.
John observed Hunter's time to be 20.4 hours (after outgoing trip and
frame change) + 9.6 hours for the return trip…20.4 + 9.6 = 30 hours.
Can you find any events in which both John and Hunter agree on the time for both themselves and the other? No, you can't. The lack of simultaneity is the key to the paradox. Both twins are measuring and observing. Unfortunately, they are not measuring and observing the same events. It is impossible for them to consider something like the end of the first leg as simultaneous when they each view it occurring at different times for Hunter. It's interesting to note that the results are the same as the Relativistic Doppler shift results. Is there a pattern here? SR allows for various methods to be employed to resolve the problems. For this case, use of space-time diagrams (there's those words again) would clearly show every point that we have talked about. I have merely used the Lorentz transforms in combination with the Relativistic Doppler effect.
We'll look at problems with the twin paradox in the next section.
More Options: