The Galaxy Just Got More Crowded


Sure there's no confirmation of alien life out there just yet, but we have made massive amounts of progress toward that type of discovery. NASA/W. Stenzel
Sure there's no confirmation of alien life out there just yet, but we have made massive amounts of progress toward that type of discovery. NASA/W. Stenzel

Today, a team of NASA scientists announced exciting news thanks to the Kepler telescope: the discovery of 1,284 new exoplanets. That's the largest number of planets announced at one time. In fact, before the announcement, NASA had verified only 984 exoplanets in our galaxy.

So how did the team more than double the number of known exoplanets? They changed their methodology when investigating potential hits. The way Kepler detects a planet involves measuring the light coming from a star. If the telescope notes a dip in observed light, that could indicate that a planet is passing between the star and Earth. We call this the transit method of detecting exoplanets — the exoplanet transits its host star.

But those transit signals aren't always planets. Sometimes it's something else that passes between the respective star and Earth, which creates a false positive. Traditionally, NASA would verify exoplanets by following up the initial detection with extensive observations. Today, researchers revealed a much faster method of verifying results, and it relies on statistical analysis.

Broadly speaking, the team looked at the detected signals that best fit the expectation of a planet and then calculated the probability of false positives, which they called "imposters." They used this to create a probabilistic model that assigned a number between 0 and 1 to each signal (a 0 being an absolute certainty that the signal represents an imposter and a 1 meaning it's definitely a planet). They then concentrated only on candidates that met a greater than 99 percent probability of being a planet.

The big advantage of this method is that it doesn't require months or years of observations to verify signals. It can point us in the right direction when we want to look at planets that could potentially support life. Those would be planets that are likely rocky and at the right distance from the host star to receive enough energy to support life (but not so much that the planet's surface is inhospitable).

Before this discovery, NASA had identified 12 exoplanets that are within the so-called Goldilocks zone, the orbital area around a star that could potentially support life as we know it. The researchers announced that nine more planets join that list thanks to the new discovery. Some of these look like particularly good candidates for possible life. But to be sure will require more study.

Unfortunately, it may be a while before we can get around to getting a closer look. NASA has plans for several more space telescopes, but they are better suited for looking at larger planets than those we'd expect to support life. It would require an as-yet unplanned telescope to get a better look at the smaller planets that orbit close to their parent stars.

It's not all bad news, though. If we look at statistical probabilities, it seems like there's little chance we're all alone out here. According to astrophysicist Natalie Batalha, statistics suggest that 24 percent of the stars in our galaxy have planets that are 1.6 times the size of Earth or smaller within the Goldilocks zone. That amounts to about 10 billion potential life-supporting planets. And we should start looking around at distances of about 11 light-years away from Earth.

So there's no confirmation of alien life out there just yet but we've made massive amounts of progress toward that type of discovery. The next time you look up at the stars, remember that there may be some life-form out there looking back.