So, just how do students interact with Noelle? Britt Guerrero, ARNP walked us through a typical teaching situation:
- The student is introduced to the patient, Noelle, via a mock shift report.
- Details like contraction frequency, whether or not the patient's amniotic fluid sac has ruptured, and cervical dilation are all reviewed.
- Information about the baby is relayed, including position and heart rate.
- The student is also shown a labor strip, which is a readout that shows the baby's heart rate, so the student can monitor how the mother's contractions are affecting fetus.
- From this point, the labor is often changed on the fly to put students through their paces. Labor can be sped up or slowed down, the fetus can be triggered to exhibit signs of distress, or the mother can experience a heart attack or stroke.
- Students address issues as they arise with the end goal of a successful delivery.
This is just one scenario. There are literally thousands of potential versions of the birth, based on how the simulation began and what elements are introduced by the instructor. Throughout the delivery exercise, conductive skin on the robotic mother and child gives realistic feedback to students via the same equipment they would use on real patients, adding a high degree of realism to the proceedings.
At each step of the process, the instructor decides if the students are handling the situation properly, and adjusts the simulation accordingly. The protocols instructors use for these simulations are developed around guidelines set forth by AWHONN (Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses) and ACOG (American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists). The school or hospital where the simulation is being performed also establishes guidelines for simulations exercises based on its curriculum. Each simulation is tracked and documented so instructors and students can review the patient file once delivery is complete.
It's clear that birth simulators add an extra dimension to the training of obstetrics personnel. New software and hardware is always being developed to more accurately replicate human deliveries in order to increase practitioner knowledge and, in turn, patient safety. Eventually, robotic simulators will likely be equipped with a full complement of bodily fluids, multiple-birth options and the ability to give emotional feedback.
- Bradley, P. "The History of Simulation in Medical Education and Possible Future Directions." Medical Education. Vol. 40, no. 3. Pages 254-262. March 2006.
- Davis, Beth Murray; et al. "Using a Childbirth Simulator in Midwifery Education." British Journal of Midwifery. Vol.17, no.4. Apr 2009.
- Dunn, Peter. "The Chamberlen Family (1560-1728) and Obstretric Forceps." Archives of Disease in Childhood, Neonatal Edition. Vol. 81. 1999.
- Dupuis, Oliver; et al. " Birth simulator: Reliability of Transvaginal Assessment of Fetal Head Station as Defined by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Classification." American Journal of Obstretric and Gynecology. Vol.192, no. 3. Pages 868-874. March 2005.
- Elias, Paul. "Robot Birth Simulator Gaining in Popularity." USA Today. April 15, 2006. (June 21, 2011) http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2006-04-15-robot_x.htm
- Elixhauser, Anne; Wier, Lauren. "Complicating Conditions of Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2008." Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. May 2011. (June 26, 2011) http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb113.jsp
- Gaumard Scientific. "About Us." Guamard.com. (June 23, 2011) http://gaumard.com/about_us.html
- Guerrero, Britt. Personal interview. June 21, 2011.
- MacDorman, Marian F. ; Mathews, Tim J. "Recent Trends in Infant Mortality in the United States." NCHS Data Brief, no. 9. National Center for Health Statistics. Oct 2008. (June 23, 2011) http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db09.htm
- Mintz, S. "Childbirth in Early America." Digital History. 2007. (June 19, 2011) http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/historyonline/childbirth.cfm
- Moreau, Richard; et al. "Simulation of Forceps Extraction on a Childbirth Simulator." 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). (Pasadena, CA). May 21, 2008.
- Reynolds, A.; et al. "Impact of Labor and Delivery Simulation Classes in Undergraduate Medical Learning." Medical Education Online. Vol. 13. Page 14. Nov 15, 2008.
- Rochford, Andrew. "Women Have a Higher Pain Threshold than Men." What's Good For You (ninemsn). April 8, 2009. (June 26, 2011) http://health.ninemsn.com.au/whatsgoodforyou/factsheets/798263/women-have-a-higher-pain-threshold-than-men
- Rogers, Simon. "Maternal Mortality: How Many Women Die in Childbirth in Your Country?" Guardian. Apr 13, 2010. (June 23, 2011) http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2010/apr/12/maternal-mortality-rates-millennium-development-goals
- Ross, Michael G. "Forceps Delivery." WebMD. June 3, 2010. (June 23, 2011) http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/263603-overview#aw2aab6b2b1aa
- Solon, Olivia. "Push, Mrs Robot, push! BirthSIM offers doctors forceps practice." Wired.co.uk. Mar 11, 2011. (June 23, 2011) http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2011-03/31/childbirth-robot-birthsim
- Vorvick, Linda; et al. "Amniotic Fluid." MedLine Plus. Sept 2, 2009. (June 26, 2011) http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/article/002220.htm
- Weis, Joshua; et al. "Obesity, Obstetric Complications and Cesarean Delivery Rate: a Population-Based Screening Study." American Journal of Obstretrics and Gynecology. Vol. 190, no. 4. Apr 2004. Pages 1091-1097.