How Bioarchaeology Works

The Proletariat Strikes Back
History always recognizes kings and pharaohs, but often omits the masses. In their versions of history, bioarchaeologists strive to include people of all social strata.
History always recognizes kings and pharaohs, but often omits the masses. In their versions of history, bioarchaeologists strive to include people of all social strata.
Brand X Pictures/Thinkstock

It's often said that historians write history -- and frequently, historians fixate on rich and famous people. But this kind of perspective doesn't tell much of the real story of ancient cultures and societies.

Anthropology professor Turner says that's why bioarchaeology is so important -- it attempts to show more of the reality behind our past.

"Bioarchaeology explicitly operates from the bottom-up, looking at the masses of people who weren't always included in historical writings or iconographic images. We are fascinated by the lives of everyone at every tier of a society, so we bring to the table a much richer and more inclusive perspective on both ancient and historical peoples."

Turner adds that bioarchaeologists also study historically marginalized groups within these ancient contexts. For example, researchers may focus on women, prisoners of war or people from a lower socioeconomic class, so that their places in history are better understood.

More expansively, this research clarifies the experiences of our ancestors over a wide range of time periods and geographic regions. We also better comprehend nutrition and diseases in historical context, see insights into population growth and population movement, and discern declines in human numbers due to disease or conflict.

Those kinds of details and stories are relevant to contemporary people. "By understanding earlier societies, we are better equipped to understand modern ones as well," adds Turner. By unearthing new knowledge, bioarchaeologists not only establish a better understanding of what happened to ancient peoples, they ultimately create a clearer picture of what exactly makes us human.

Related Articles

More Great Links


  • American Anthropological Association. “Anthropology: Education for the 21st Century.” (March 29, 2011).
  • Apo, Peter. “Kawaiahao Burials Dispute a Defining Moment for Hawaiians.” March 20, 2011. (March 29, 2011). dispute_a_defining_moment_for_Hawaiians.html
  • Arizona State University Website. “Center for Bioarchaeological Research.” (March 29, 2011).
  • Arizona State University Website. “Bioarchaeology and the Center for Bioarchaeological Research.” (March 29, 2011).
  • Armelagos, George J., and Dennis P. Van Gerven. "A Century of Skeletal Biology and Paleopathology: Contrast, Contradictions, and Conflict." American Anthropologist. March 2003. (March 29, 2011)                                             
  • Buikstra, Jane E. and Lane A. Beck. “Bioarchaeology: The Contextual Analysis of Human Remains.” Elsevier. 2006. (March 29, 2011).
  • Craig, Suzanne. “Researchers Track Changes in Gene Pool Caused by Immigration.” Arbiter Online. March 17, 2011. (March 29, 2011).
  • Evans, Murray. “Choctaw Indians Reburying 124 Ancestors Unearthed by Archeologists.” March 18, 2011. (March 29, 2011). Choctaw-Indians-Reburying-124-Ancestors-Unearthed-by-Archeologists
  • Knudson, Kelly J. and Christopher Michael Stojannowski. “Bioarchaeology and Identity in the Americas.” University Press of Florida. 2009.
  • Larsen, Clark Spencer. “Bioarchaeology. Interpreting Behavior from the Human Skeleton.” Cambridge University Press. 1997.
  • Lewis, Mary E. “The Bioarchaeology of Children.” Cambridge University Press. 2006.
  • Mays, Simon. “The Archeology of Human Bones.” Routledge. 1998.
  • Meyers, Katy. “Understanding Wari Mortuary Practices.” March 17, 2011. (March 29, 2011).
  • National Park Service. “National NAGPRA.” (March 29, 2011).
  • Piper, Kat. “Fossil 'Apes' Not Necessarily Human Ancestors, Say Anthropologists.” The Epoch Times. Feb. 28, 2011. (March 29, 2011).
  • Prestidge, Holly. “VMFA Returns Native American Headdress.” Richmond-Times Dispatch. March 10, 2011. (March 29, 2011).
  • Rose, Jerome C., Thomas J. Green, and Victoria D. Green. "NAGPRA is Forever: Osteology and the Repatriation of Skeletons." Annual Review of Anthropology. Vol. 25. 81-103. October 1996.
  • Turner, Bethany, John D. Kingston, and George J. Armelagos. “Variation in Dietary Histories Among Immigrants of Machu Picchu: Carbon and Nitrogen Isotope Evidence.” (March 29, 2011).
  • Waghmare, Vijay Kumar R., Rupali B. Gaikwad, and N.G. Herekar. “Estimation of the Stature from the Anthropometric Measurement of Hand Length.” The Internet Journal of Biological Anthropology. 2011. Volume 4 Number 2. (March 29, 2011).
  • Walker, Phillip L. "A Bioarchaeological Perspective on the History of Violence." Annual Review of Anthropology. 2001. (March 29, 2011)       
  • Weiss, Elizabeth. “Osteoarthritis and Body Mass.” Journal of Archaeological Science. 2006. (March 29, 2011).
  • Weiss, Elizabeth. “Understanding Muscle Markers: Lower Limbs.” American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 2004. (March 29, 2011).
  • Weiss, Elizabeth and Jurmain, Robert. “Development Influences on Upper Limb Asymmetry in a Skeletal Population from Central California.” (March 29, 2011).
  • Weiss, Elizabeth. “The Attack on Scientific Freedom.” Liberty. December 2009. (March 29, 2011).

More to Explore