In everything from blockbuster movies to the imaginations of children, Tyrannosaurus rex is a bloodthirsty predator. It's fast and agile, able to chase down a Jeep and recover from being bowled over by King Kong. If you stand in front of a full-size T. rex skeleton in a museum, your own instincts might support that idea. The same would be true if you found yourself face to face with any other member of its family, Tyrannosauridae. These dinosaurs all had armlike forelimbs, a bipedal gait and huge mouths full of startlingly jagged teeth.
Dinosaur Image Gallery
Most of the time, the Tyrannosauridae were the largest carnivores in their respective ecosystems. And aside from Hollywood drama, there's some fossil evidence to suggest that they deserve their reputation as aggressive predators. From the side, a tyrannosaurid's jaws look like saw blades made from long, daggerlike teeth. The teeth themselves are serrated, too, ideal for cutting their way through meat. According to analysis of skull fossils, Tyrannosaurus could bite down with a force of 183,000 to 325,000 newtons (3,822 to 6,788 pounds per square foot) [source: Meers]. Other researchers used the damage from a T. rex bite on a Triceratops fossil to estimate that the tyrant lizard's bite exerted a force of about 3,000 pounds (143,641 newtons), similar to the bite force of an alligator [source: Leutwyler]. Either way, T. rex's bite would be an ample weapon against large, prehistoric prey.
In contrast to its relatively small arms, T. rex had powerful legs. Its thigh bones were relatively long, a trait common in animals with good running endurance. This suggests that a tyrannosaur's legs were adapting for traveling over long distances for long periods of time, perhaps to chase down other dinosaurs.
Not all of the evidence for a predatory nature in T. rex comes from its own fossils. Many of the prey species that lived at the time have elaborate body parts that can be interpreted as defense mechanisms. Triceratops, for example, has a bony frill protecting its neck in addition to the three horns for which it is named. Though there were other predators against which the frill would be useful as defense, T. rex would have been the largest most of the time.
But how does this evidence stack up to the other side of the coin -- the idea that T. rex was basically a giant Cretaceous vulture? Would those powerful legs really allow a massive dinosaur to move quickly enough to capture prey? And is there any evidence that tyrannosaurids hunted? We'll explore these questions on the next page.
Cretaceous Vultures: Tyrannosaur Scavengers
The idea that T. rex might have been a scavenger has been around since the early 1900s. The most famous proponent of the theory today is John R. Horner of Montana State University. According to Horner and other paleontologists, there are lots of reasons why T. rex may not have been a predator.
One argument plays off the theory that dinosaurs evolved into birds. Some of the world's largest flying birds, such as condors, are scavengers -- they eat what they find instead of what they kill. By this logic, really big dinosaurs might have been scavengers, just like their really big avian counterparts today.
This is mostly speculative, but some aspects of T. rex anatomy suggest that it was a scavenger. Its nasal passages, for instance, are huge, potentially perfect for smelling faraway carrion. A tyrannosaurus's teeth and jaw are made for biting -- hard. When a T. rex closed its mouth, the lower teeth met the inside of the upper teeth, concentrating lots of force upward from the inside and downward from the outside. This force could break a bone just like you could break a stick if you bend it with two hands. Paleontologists have also analyzed a coprolite, or a pile of fossilized T. rex dung, and found bone fragments inside. This may mean that the dinosaur relied on picked-over bones for nourishment. To some, the presence of lots of broken teeth also suggests that T. rex chewed its way through bones out of necessity, damaging its teeth in the process.
The scavenger theory applies to a tyrannosaur's body, too. Calculations made by paleontologist James Farlow suggest that T. rex was so massive that it would have sustained life-threatening injuries if it fell while running [source: Hecht]. There's also the matter of T. rex's almost comically undersized forelimbs, which would not be of use in breaking a fall or helping the animal regain its footing.
Scientists also debate whether the dinosaur could run at all, and it would need to run to capture prey. There's no footprint, or trackway, evidence to suggest that it did, but most trackways aren't big enough to encompass the stride a T. rex would have used when running. Several studies analyzing different aspects of tyrannosaur physiology suggest that T. rex's speed topped out at about 10 meters per second, or 22 mph, but others suggest that it may have run much faster. Researchers John Hutchinson and Mariano Garcia suggest that tyrannosaur legs couldn't have supported enough muscle to allow fast running [source: Fitzgerald].
According to Graeme D. Ruxton and David C. Houston of the University of Glasgow, T. rex could have supported itself by eating only dead animals if the ecosystem had about the same amount of carrion as today's Serengeti. The two came to this conclusion by studying the energy it would take to find food compared to the energy the food would provide the dinosaur [source: Ruxton and Houston].
So it was possible that T. rex was a scavenger -- but was it likely? Next, we'll explore some of the most common counterarguments.
Cretaceous Hyenas: Tyrannosaur Opportunists
One possible discovery could offer proof that Tyrannosaurus rex was a scavenger -- evidence of healed-over tyrannosaur bites in other fossils. Most fossilized dinosaurs died from events unrelated to being eaten, so it should be easy to tell whether they survived past attacks from predators. Unfortunately, there are few fossils that show clear evidence of past T. rex bites.
John W. Happ of Shenandoah University suggests a Triceratops whose skull was discovered in 1997 lived for years after being bitten by a T. rex [source: Perkins]. An Edmontosaurus fossil shows evidence of vertebral spines that re-grew after a bite that may have been inflicted by a tyrannosaur [source: Carpenter]. But there are few such examples, and the cause of the bone damage is difficult to prove conclusively. There's also the question of whether any animal would survive long enough for its T. rex bite to heal.
Some of the same evidence used to suggest that T. rex may have been a predator can be interpreted differently. For example, T. rex had tiny arms, especially compared to the prehistoric raptors. But some researchers point out that armlike forelimbs aren't a prerequisite for being a predator -- snakes, for instance, manage without them. One study also defies the idea that these limbs were useless. Kenneth Carpenter of the Denver Museum of Natural History suggests that based on the size, shape and position of the arm bones and shoulder blades, these apparently puny limbs were powerful.
Then there's the matter of the abundance of broken dinosaur teeth some interpret as evidence of eating abandoned bones. If T. rex was a predator, it might have used one of many methods to attack prey, and each could have resulted in broken teeth. Tyrannosaurs might have:
- Ripped through the neck or throat, causing teeth to meet vertebrae and the skull
- Charged at prey with its mouth wide open to inflict a devastating wound, breaking teeth on whatever bones it hit
- Attacked with a bite to the abdomen, hitting ribs in the process
Plus, an animal as large as T. rex may have needed bones for nourishment regardless of whether it killed an animal or found a corpse.
This counterargument even gets down to the defense mechanisms of T. rex's potential prey. Was the neck frill on a Triceratops for protection or sexual display? And did it use its horn for defense against predators or combat with intruders on its territory? Since we have no way to observe the behavior of these animals, we don't really know. The most logical answer may be that Tyrannosaurus rex, like many large predators, was an opportunist, catching fresh meat when possible and eating carrion when necessary.
Related HowStuffWorks Articles
- Can scientists clone dinosaurs?
- How do scientists determine the age of dinosaur bones?
- How Dinosaurs Work
- Recent Dinosaur Discoveries
- How Extinction Works
- How the Earth Works
- How DNA Works
- How Evolution Works
- Dinosaur Encyclopedia
- Triassic and Early Jurassic Periods
- Middle and Late Jurassic Periods
- Early Cretaceous Period
- Late Cretaceous Period
- Dinosaur Quiz
More Great Links
- Abler, William L. "The Teeth of the Tyrannosaurs." Scientific American. Vol. 281, Issue 3. September 1999.
- Alexander, R. McNeill. "Dinosaur Biomechanics." Proceedings of the Royal Society of Biological Sciences. Vol. 273, no. 1596. August 2006. (7/8/2008) http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1634776
- Burress, Charles. "Rattling Bones: Paleontologists Debate T. rex's Nature as a Predator or Scavenger." SFGate. 2/5/2001 (7/8/2008)
- Carpenter, Kenneth and Matt Smith. "Forelimb Osteology and Biomechanics of Tyrannosaurus Rex." Mesozoic Vertebrate Life. Tanke, Darren H. and Kenneth Carpenter, eds. (7/8/2008) http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=mgc6CS4EUPsC&oi=fnd&pg =PA90&dq=tyrannosaurus+predator&ots=370vbK9E-x&sig= vhs3qYGCYm2e51smcZeTE_Xd2PI
- Carpenter, Kenneth. "Evidence of Predatory Behavior by Carnivorous Dinosaurs." Gaia. December 1998.
- Carpenter, Kenneth. "Forelimb Biomechanics of Nonavian Theropod Dinosaurs in Predation." Concepts of Functional, Engineering and Constructional Morphology. Vol. 82, no. 1 2002 (7/8/2008) https://scientists.dmns.org/sites/kencarpenter/PDFs%20of%20publications/ theropod%20forelimb.pdf
- Earth. "Tyrannosaurus Droppings." Vol. 4 Issue 6. December 1995.
- Erikson, Gregory M. "Breathing Life into Tyrannosaurus Rex." Scientific American. March 2004 Special Edition.
- Farlow, James O. and Thomas R. Holtz. "The Fossil Record of Predation in Dinosaurs." Paleontological Society Papers. Vol. 8, 2002.
- Fitzgerald, Richard. "How Fast Could Tyrannosaurus rex Run?" Physics Today. April 2002.
- Hecht, Jeff. "The Bigger they Are, the Harder they Fall." New Scientist. 10/7/2995 (7/8/2008) http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg14819982.600-the-bigger-they- come-the-harder-they-fall.html
- Hutchinson, John R. and Mariano Garcia. "Tyrannosaurus Was Not a Fast Runner." Nature. Vol. 415. 2/28/2002
- Leutwyler, Kristen. "Jurassic Jawbreakers." Scientific American. November 1996.
- Lingham-Soliar, Theagarten. "Guess Who's Coming to Dinner: A Portrait of Tyrannosaurus rex as a Predator." Geology Today. January-February 1998.
- Meers, Mason B. "Maximum Bite Force and Prey Size of Tyrannosaurus rex and Their Relationships to the Inference of Feeding Behavior." Historical Biology. Vol. 16, No. 1 March 2002.
- Nicholls, Henry. "T. rex's Shock-absorbing Skull." ScienceNow. 6/9/2004.
- Perkins, Sid. "Healed Scars Tag T. rex as Predator." Science News. Vol. 64, Issue 18, 1/1/2003.
- Ruxton, Graeme D. and David C. Houston."Could Tyrannosaurus rex Have Been a Scavenger Rather Than a Predator? An Energetics Approach." Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B. Vol. 270, 2003.
- Stokstad, Erik. "T. rex Was No Runner, Muscle Study Shows." Science. Vol. 295, Issue 5560, 3/1/2002.
- Tanke, Darren H. "Head-biting Behavior in Theropod Dinosaurs: Paleopathological Evidence." Gaia. No. 15. December 1998.
- UCMP Berkley. "The Tyrannosauridae." (7/8/2008) http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/diapsids/saurischia/tyrannosauridae.html