Are you really only using 10 percent of your brain?

This man can't figure out why we'd only use 10 percent of our brains. See more brain pictures.
Chris Ryan/OJO Images Ltd/Getty Images

Chances are, at one time or another, somebody -- your fourth-grade teacher, an uncle concerned about your future prospects or a $200-an-hour corporate career coach -- has explained to you that most people only use 10 percent of their brains. This tidbit, which has been circulating since at least the mid-1930s and is still repeated in contemporary self-help books, often seems to be shared for motivational purposes: If you'd only wake up, smell the coffee and put more of your precious gray matter to use, you'd surely leave behind those legions of ordinary neuron-squandering dolts and climb to success.

There's only one catch: However widely accepted it is, the idea that people manage to function normally while utilizing such a miniscule portion of their brains is total nonsense. For years, doctors, brain researchers and science journalists have been explaining patiently to anyone who would listen that there is no scientific basis for what they call the 10-percent brain myth. Similarly, prestigious and credible publications like Scientific American and the New York Times have sought to dispel it as well, with little effect [sources: Beyerstein, Parker-Pope]. In a non-scientific Internet poll on the Web site, for example, 52 percent of respondents believed incorrectly that humans use only 10 percent of their brains, while 48 percent correctly disagreed [source: Helium]. The mistaken notion is so pervasive, in fact, that in a study published in the Journal of Psychology in 1998, researchers found that college psychology majors, who presumably should know better, were as likely to believe it as other students [source: Higbee].

"Despite much contrary data and its affront to logic, this hoary myth refuses to die, no doubt because of (you guessed it) the considerable uplift and encouragement it affords, not to mention the profit it generates for those who hawk self-improvement products that exploit the myth," neuroscientists Sergio Della Sala and Barry L. Beyerstein once lamented in an essay. "If 90 percent of the brain were really a cerebral spare tire, as many of these hucksters claim, learning to tap its unused capacity would be the route to fabulous achievement, riches and fame -- even, according to many New Age entrepreneurs, the pathway to psychic powers and transcendent bliss" [source: Della Sala].

So what's the truth about how much of your brain you actually use? And how do scientists study how the brain functions? Find out on the next few pages.


19th Century Brain Researchers

How do you cook up an idea that's so plausible and appealing, yet completely mistaken? You start by misinterpreting the incomplete scientific knowledge of the time. Then, take a couple of esteemed men of science and misquote them.

In the 19th and early 20th centuries, medical researchers who studied the brains of animals and stroke victims discovered that different brain areas controlled different activities. In the 1870s, for example, German physiologists Gustav Fritsch and Eduard Hitzig electrically stimulated a spot in a dog's brain and noticed that the dog moved its right front paw. When they surgically removed that tissue from two other dogs, they noticed that the dogs not only couldn't use the paw, but seemed unaware of it [source: Finger]. Over the next half-century, other researchers eagerly zapped various parts of animal and human brains in an attempt to map brain function. But they were only able to figure out what about 10 percent of the brain did, because when they stimulated the other 90 percent, no muscles twitched. Scientists labeled that area the silent cortex because its function was unknown. We now know that's the area that, among other things, controls language and abstract thinking [source: Wanjek]. Non-scientists, however, mistakenly took this to mean that most of the human brain was on permanent vacation.

Through the miracle of misquotation, some celebrated minds also have helped promote the 10 percent brain myth. Pioneering psychologist-philosopher William James, wrote in a 1906 essay that he believed "we are only making use of a small part of our possible mental and physical resources" [source: James]. Journalist Lowell Thomas -- the same promotional genius who helped make Lawrence of Arabia into a legend -- tinkered with James' words to help market self-improvement guru Dale Carnegie's 1936 book "How to Win Friends and Influence People." In the book's forward, Thomas wrote that "the average person develops only 10 percent of his latent mental ability," and attributed that information to James [source: Carnegie].

Since then, other self-help authors have attributed the idea that we only use 10 percent of the brain's capacity to Albert Einstein -- a curious source, since his expertise was in physics, not neuroscience. In 2004, a thorough search by staffers of the Einstein archives at California Institute of Technology, however, found no evidence that he ever made such a statement [source: Beyerstein].

Activity in the Brain

We use all the gears that churn inside our heads -- not just 10 percent of them.
We use all the gears that churn inside our heads -- not just 10 percent of them.
John Foxx/Getty Images

This may come as a surprise -- accustomed as you probably are to the idea that nine-tenths of your brain's 100 billion or so neurons are wasting away in Margaritaville. But today's brain researchers, who have much more sophisticated tools than the old electrode-zappers, have discovered that the human brain doesn't seem to have any dormant regions. "It turns out, though, that we use virtually every part of the brain, and that [most of] the brain is active almost all the time," Johns Hopkins University neurologist Barry Gordon explained to Scientific American in 2008 [source: Boyd].

If you stop to think about it, this shocking revelation is only logical. As science journalist Christopher Wanjek points out in his 2005 book "Bad Medicine," if a human needed only 10 percent of the brain to function, it's unlikely that evolution would have allowed the other 90 percent to develop. The brain, after all, is a glutton for resources. Though it amounts to only five percent of the body's weight, it consumes 20 percent of our supply of oxygen and glucose, and demands a continual supply of both to keep working [source: Wanjek]. Additionally, if a human being only needed 10 percent of his or her brain to function normally, we'd be invulnerable to brain diseases (not to mention head traumas short of decapitation). Instead, as brain researcher Barry J. Beyerstein noted in a 2004 Scientific American article, destroying far less than 90 percent of the brain can have a catastrophic effect, and there doesn't seem to be any portion of the brain that a person can lose without experiencing some sort of loss of function [source: Beyerstein]. Wanjek explains: "A person would be comatose if 90 percent of the brain -- any 90 percent -- were inactive" [source: Wanjek].

It is true that different parts of the brain do different things, and not all at the same time. But while not every single ounce of that three-pound hunk of goo inside your skull is necessarily working at any given moment, brain scans show that over a 24-hour period, pretty much the whole brain gets a workout, and most of the parts are continually active. Even when you're sleeping, regions such as the frontal cortex, which controls higher-level thinking and self-awareness, and the somatosensory areas, which help you to sense your surroundings, remain active [source: Boyd].

Brain-imaging Tools

Unlike their 19th century predecessors, who had to be content with mucking around with scalpels and shooting electricity into random spots of the brain to see what happened, today's neuroscientists have at their disposal an array of sophisticated technology for probing the mysteries of how the brain works.

One extremely useful tool for researchers who treat brain diseases and injuries is functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), which uses a powerful magnetic field, radio frequency pulses and a computer to produce a series of detailed pictures of a person's brain as it works. An fMRI not only provides a look at brain's anatomy, but also to determine precisely which parts are handling activities such as thinking, speech, movement and sensation. (That sort of study is called brain mapping) [source:].

Another way to look at the brain is to use a computerized axial tomography (CT) scan, which takes a series of X-rays of the brain and uses a computer to combine them into an image [source: National Headache Foundation]. Yet another imaging technology is the positron emission tomography (PET) scan. For this scan, a small amount of radioactive material is injected into a vein, inhaled or swallowed. The radioactive material accumulates in the brain and gives off gamma rays, which are captured with a special type of camera [source:]. PET scans are useful for identifying brain abnormalities and studying which parts of the brain are most active during certain tasks [source: Mayo Clinic].

Sophisticated brain-imaging tools also enable neurosurgeons to plan operations and to cut with more precision when they remove tumors, so that there is less damage to patients' brains. When a talented young French horn player was recently diagnosed with a large brain tumor, for example, doctors feared that it might end his musical career. Dr. Susan Bookheimer, a neurosurgeon at UCLA medical school, had him undergo an fMRI scan while reading sheet music and fingering an instrument, so she could pinpoint the areas of the brain he was using. As a result, surgeons were able to avoid damaging those areas when they removed the tumor, and the musician was back playing in a few months [source:].

Related HowStuffWorks Articles


  • ABC News. "20/20 Busts 10 Body Myths." June 23, 2006. (July 20, 2009)
  • Senior Health. "Mapping Alzheimer's Disease Path." July 20, 2006. (July 21, 2009)
  • "UCLA Brain Imaging Research-Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging." 2009. (July 21, 2009)
  • Beyerstein, Barry L. "Do we really use only 10 percent of our brains." Scientific American. March 8, 2004. (July 20, 2009)
  • Boyd, Robynne. "What's the matter with only exploiting a portion of our gray matter?" Scientific American. Feb. 7, 2008. (July 20, 2009)
  • California Institute of Technology. "Einstein Archives Online." Undated. (July 21, 2009)
  • Carnegie, Dale. "How to Win Friends and Influence People." Simon & Schuster. 1982. (July 21, 2009)
  • Carroll, Aaron, and Vreeman, Rachel. "Don't Swallow Your Gum! Myths, Half-Truths, and Outright Lies About Your Body and Health." St. Martin's Griffin. 2009. (July 21, 2009)
  • Cordon, Luis. "Popular Psychology: An Encyclopedia." Greenwood Press. 2005. (July 21, 2009)
  • Cornell University. "Ask A Scientist." Aug. 29, 2007. (July 20, 2009)
  • Della Sala, Sergio. "Tall Tales About the Mind and Brain." Oxford University Press. 2007. (July 20, 2009)
  • DeMoss, Robert T. "Brain Waves Through Time: 12 Principles for Understanding Evolution of the Human Brain and Man's Behavior." Plenium Trade. 1999.
  • Finger, Stanley. "Minds Behind the Brain: A History of the Pioneers and Their Discoveries." Oxford University Press. 2005. (July 20, 2009),&source=gbs_navlinks_s
  • Heath, Chip and Heath, Dan. "Why do some ideas succeed while others fail?" Stanford Business Magazine. February 2007. (July 20, 2009)
  • Helium. "Debate: Do Humans Only Use 10 Percent of Their Brain?" Undated. (July 20, 2009)
  • Higbee, Kenneth L., and Clay, Samuel L. "College Students' Belief in the Ten-Percent Myth," Journal of Psychology,1998, Volume 132, Issue 5, page 469-475. (July 20, 2009)
  • James, William. "Memories and Studies." Longmans, Green and Co. 1911 (July 20, 2009)
  • Johnson, George. "How Much Give Can the Brain Take?" The New York Times. Oct. 24, 1999.
  • Kruszelnicki, Karl and Yazxhi, Adam. "Great Mythconceptions: The Science Behind the Myths." Andrews McMeel Publishing. 2006. (July 20, 2009)
  • Mayo Clinic. "Positron emission tomography (PET) scan." May 8, 2009. (July 21, 2009)
  • National Headache Foundation. "CT Scan." 2009. (July 21, 2009)
  • Parker-Pope, Tara. "Medical Myths Even Doctors Believe," The New York Times. Dec. 26, 2007.
  • Persaud, Raj. "You Need Your Brain-All of It," The Times Educational Supplement. May 13, 2005.
  • Pickover, Clifford A. "Strange Brains and Genius: The Secret Lives of Eccentric Scientists and Madmen," Harper Perennial. 1999 (July 21, 2009)
  • Psyblog, "Seriously, Would You Admit to Only Using 10% of Your Brain?" February 2008. (July 20, 2009)
  • Radford, Benjamin. "The 10 Percent Myth." Skeptical Inquirer. March/April 1999. (July 20, 2009)
  • "Functional MR Imaging (fMRI) - Brain." June 20, 2009. (June 21, 2009)
  • "Positron Emission Tomography - Computed Tomography (PET/CT). June 15, 2009. (July 21, 2009)
  • "Scans show dramatic brain cell loss in Alzheimer's." Feb. 6, 2003 (July 21, 2009)
  • Wanjek, Christopher. "Bad Medicine: Misconceptions and Misuses Revealed, from Distance Healing to Vitamin O." Wiley. 2002. (July 21, 2009)
  • Williams, Geoff. "Myth Buster: Ten Percent of Your Brain." AARP Bulletin Today. June 26, 2008. (July 20, 2009)
  • Zweifel, Thomas D. "Communicate or Die: Getting Results Through Speaking and Listening." Swiss Consulting Group. 2003. (July 21, 2009)