So, the world of math offers up numerous number types, each with its own particular properties. Mathematicians formulate theories about the relationships between numbers and number groups. They uphold their theories with **axioms** (previously established statements presumed to be true) and **theorems** (statements based on other theorems or axioms).

The first step in building a shiny, new, mathematical theory, however, is asking a theoretical question about number relationships. For example, can the sum of two cubes be a cube? Remember the Pythagorean triples from the previous page? These trios of three numbers, such as (3, 4, 5), solve the equation a^{2} + b^{2} = c^{2}. But what about a^{3} + b^{3} = c^{3}? Mathematician Pierre de Fermat asked the same question about cubes and, in 1637, he claimed to have worked out a mathematical **proof** that, via line after line of painstaking logic, showed beyond any doubt that no, the sum of two cubes can't be a cube. We call this **Fermat's Last Theorem**. Unfortunately, instead of providing the full proof in his notes, Fermat merely wrote, "I have a truly marvelous demonstration of this proposition which this margin is too narrow to contain" [source: NOVA].

More than three and a half centuries followed during which mathematicians around the world tried in vain to rediscover Fermat's proof. What was riding on this quest? Nothing, save academic pride and the love of pure, abstract mathematics. Then in 1993, with the aid of computational math undiscovered in Fermat's time, English mathematician Andrew Wiles succeeded in proving the 356-year-old theorem. Experts continue to dispute whether Fermat actually worked out such a phenomenal proof in his pre-computer age, or if he was mistaken.

Other questions in number theory related to various perceived or theoretical patterns in numbers or number groups. It all begins with that most crucial aspect of intelligent thought: pattern recognition. Brown University mathematics professor Joseph H. Silverman lays out five basic steps in number theory:

- Accumulate mathematical or abstract data.
- Examine the data and search for patterns or relationships.
- Formulate a
**conjecture**(typically in the form of an equation) to explain these patterns or relationships. - Test the conjecture with additional data.
- Devise a proof showing the conjecture to be correct. The proof should start with known facts and end with the desired result.

Fermat's Last Theorem, therefore, was really a conjecture for 356 years and only became a true theorem in 1993. Others, such as Euclid's Proof of Infinite Primes (which proves that prime numbers are limitless), has remained a solid model of mathematical reasoning since 300 B.C. Still other number theory conjectures, both old and new, remain unproofed.

Numbers are as infinite as human understanding is finite, so number theory and its various subfields will continue to captivate the minds of math lovers for ages. Old problems may fall, but new and more complicated conjectures will rise.

Explore the links below for more information on mathematics.

### Related Articles

**Sources**

- LeVeque, William J. "Elementary Theory of Numbers." Dover Publications, Inc. 1990.
- Silverman, Joseph H. "A Friendly Introduction to Number Theory." 1997. Prentice Hall.
- "Solving Fermat: Andrew Wiles." NOVA Online. November 2000. (June 9, 2011) http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/proof/wiles.html