How Space Regulation Works

What, No Starfleet?

Shows like "Star Trek" portray Earth as united under one government -- usually a council of fit, jumpsuit-clad, utopians who call the shots for everything from domestic defense to issuing medallions for space taxis. Probably, they have mandatory group sing-alongs over lunch, too.

Until that golden future arrives, however, we're stuck with herding cats -- feral, territorial, claw-baring cats.

Relax. It can be done. Take the Convention on International Civil Aviation, aka the Chicago Convention, which governs international air travel. Since 1947, 191 countries have agreed to be legally bound by the convention's articles, which work because they have something that space law lacks: an oversight authority, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), with enough power to enforce and set standards.

Or consider the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Established in 1865 to coordinate telegraph and telephone practices, it later added radio to its repertoire. Then, as the space age dawned, it began overseeing satellites, making sure their radio bursts didn't bring static to the lives of other radio users. Today, the ITU sets satellite licensing and operation standards, and coordinates orbits for 193 member states (and counting).

By comparison, the United Nations Committee on Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS) is some pretty weak sauce.Founded in 1959, the committee lacks the teeth of the aviation authority and the wholesale buy-in of the telecom union; should the day come when someone needs to restrain the robber barons of space, the U.N. will need to deputize COPUOS or make way for a new sheriff.

As the ITU and the Chicago Convention show, the key to getting everyone to sit at the same table lies in solving shared problems using enlightened self-interest. Enlightened self-interest is the philosophy behind traffic laws and temporary alliances on "Survivor." Unfortunately, the process tends to resemble the latter more than the former: The global community still struggles to agree on restricted items or enforcement procedures, and agreements are usually carried out at each country's discretion [source: Spencer].

Take, for example, the 1987 Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR), established to slow or halt the proliferation of missiles capable of delivering weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) [source: MTCR]. Though rigorously applied, it remains informal and voluntary.

The 1996 Wassenaar Arrangement on Export Controls for Conventional Arms and Dual-Use Goods and Technologies seeks to keep rogue states from getting their unstable hands on dangerous conventional weapons, including rockets and ballistic or cruise missiles with a range of 25 kilometers (15.5 miles) or more [sources: Spencer; Wassenaar].

These agreements serve vital functions, and might one day provide the blueprint for a new space agreement, one that lays down binding standards that are policed by a group with enough clout to see them through. Until then, as long as nations can choose how they comply with the standards set down in the handful of binding and nonbinding space agreements, we are likely to witness a wide range of practices, for good or ill.

Related Articles

More Great Links


  • Broad, William J. and David E. Sanger. "Flexing Muscle, China Destroys Satellite in Test." The New York Times. Jan. 19, 2007. (March 6, 2012)
  • Chang. Kenneth. "Space Station Crew Board 'Lifeboat ' to Dodge Debris." The New York Times. March 12, 2009. (March 6, 2012)
  • Cogliati-Bantz, Vincent P. "Disentangling the 'Genuine Link': Enquiries in Sea, Air and Space Law." Nordic Journal of International Law. Vol. 79. Page 383. 2010.
  • Fathi, Nazila and William J. Broad. "Iran Launches Satellite in a Challenge for Obama." The New York Times. Feb. 3, 2009. (March 6, 2012)
  • Hoversten, Captain Michael R. "U.S. National Security and Government Regulation of Commercial Remote Sensing from Outer Space." Air Force Law Review. Vol. 50. Page 254. January 2001.
  • International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). "Convention on Civil Aviation ('Chicago Convention)." Dec. 7, 1944. (March 8, 2012)
  • Kopal, Vladimir. "Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies, New York, 19 December 1966." Audiovisual Library of International Law. 2008. (March 8, 2012)
  • Macauley, Molly K. "Out of Space? Regulation and Technical Change in Communications Satellites." American Economic Review. Vol. 76. No. 1. May 1986.
  • Macauley, Molly K. "Regulation on the Final Frontier." Regulation. Summer 2003. (March 5, 2012)
  • McDougal, Myres S. and Leon S. Lipson. "Perspectives for a Law of Outer Space." American Journal of International Law. Vol. 52. Page 407. 1958.
  • McDougall, Walter A. "The Heavens and the Earth: A Political History of the Space Age." Johns Hopkins University Press. 1997.
  • Meyer, Zach. "Private Commercialization of Space in an International Regime: A Proposal for a Space District." Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business. Vol. 30. Page 241. 2010.
  • NASA. "Space Act Agreement between National Aeronautics and Space Administration and Space Exploration Technologies Corp. for Commercial Orbital Transportation Services Demonstration (COTS)." May 30, 2006. (March 7, 2012)
  • NASA. "Space Debris and Human Spacecraft." (March 7, 2012)
  • New Scientist (editorial). "The Legal Has Landed." New Scientist. Vol. 209, no. 2802. March 5, 2011.
  • Rajagopalan, Rajeswari Pillai. "India's Changing Policy on Space Militarization: The Impact of China's ASAT Test." India Review. Vol. 10, no. 4. Page 354. October-December, 2011.
  • Ravich, Timothy M. "2010: Space Law in the Sunshine State." The Florida Bar Journal. September/October 2010.
  • Sang-Hun, Choe and David E. Sanger. "North Koreans Launch Rocket over the Pacific." The New York Times. April 5, 2009. (March 7, 2012)
  • Spencer, Major Ronald L., Jr. "State Supervision of Space Activity." Air Force Law Review. Vol. 63. Page 75. January 2009.
  • Sterns, Patricia Margaret and Leslie I. Tennen. "State and Municipal Regulation of the Aerospace Industry in the United States." In Ram S. Jakhu (ed.), National Regulation of Space Activities, Pg. 467 Space Regulations Library 5, DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-9008-9_21, Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010.
  • United Nations. "Agreement Governing the Activities of States on the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies." 1984. (March 7, 2012)
  • United Nations. "Agreement on the Rescue of Astronauts, the Return of Astronauts and the Return of Objects Launched into Outer Space." 1968. (March 7, 2012)
  • United Nations. "Convention on International Liability for Damage Caused by Space Objects." 1972. (March 7, 2012)
  • United Nations. "Convention on Registration of Objects Launched into Outer Space." 1976. (March 7, 2012)
  • United Nations. "Declaration of Legal Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space." 1963. (March 7, 2012)
  • United Nations. "Declaration on International Cooperation in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space for the Benefit and in the Interest of All States, Taking into Particular Account the Needs of Developing Countries." 1996. (March 7, 2012)
  • United Nations. "Principles Governing the Use by States of Artificial Earth Satellites for International Direct Television Broadcasting." 1982. (March 7, 2012)
  • United Nations. "Principles Relating to Remote Sensing of the Earth from Outer Space." 1986. (March 7, 2012)
  • United Nations. "Principles Relevant to the Use of Nuclear Power Sources in Outer Space." 1992. (March 7, 2012)\
  • United Nations. "Treaty on Principles Governing the Activities of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space, including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies." 1967. (March 7, 2012)

More to Explore