Stephen Hawking once pointed out that if we wanted to leap through time, it would help if we had a machine like the LHC that could accelerate us to nearly the speed of light. Yes sir, the LHC is impressive enough for Hawking to see it as a time travel transportation option. And it certainly didn't get its reputation for nothing: The hulking particle accelerator earned its stripes when it gave us evidence for the Higgs boson in 2012 and 2013. Finding the Higgs in the LHC basically confirmed the Standard Model of physics, which outlines the fundamental particles and forces in the universe. No small feat.
Of course "small" isn't a term we usually associate with the LHC, or the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) for that matter. Consider the accelerator complex at CERN, which is a lot more than just the LHC. If you were to just dump protons into the LHC without any preliminary steps, there wouldn't be much experimentation to speak of: You need to not just speed up the protons before they enter the LHC, but also concentrate them in dense beams. In order to do that, there are a few steps that need to be taken before they whiz off to their violent fate in the LHC [sources: LHC Facts, CERN]:
- First, the protons must be fed into a linear accelerator that gets their initial speed up -- that line is about 98 feet (30 meters).
- After that, the proton beams enter into the Proton Synchrotron Booster, which speeds them up even faster with a pulsing electric field. The booster is 515 feet (157 meters) in circumference, and -- foreshadowing the answer to our main question -- it's circular, which allows the particles to go faster. (We'll get into that more with the main LHC.)
- After the booster, the packets of proton beams move into the Proton Synchrotron, another circular track designed to whip those protons into a frenzy. It's about 2,000 feet (628 meters) in circumference, and they begin to move so fast that they literally cannot go faster. The protons move at 99.9 percent the speed of light, which means that they start gaining mass instead of velocity. Ready for LHC, right?
- Nope, still not good enough for our little bundles of proton energy. The next step is the Super Proton Synchrotron. (No, the Super Terrific Proton Synchrotron won't follow it.) This is a nearly 4.5-mile (7-kilometer) circular accelerator that, well, you know: It makes the protons go "faster," which actually means that they're adding energy, which adds mass. Only then -- after a journey through miles of various accelerators -- do the protons even reach the 27-kilometer LHC, and get to take a not-so-leisurely stroll through the collider's vacuum tubes.
And now here we are: in the vast Large Hadron Collider. It looks like a beautiful crystal cave. (Just kidding, it looks like a brightly lit, obsessively clean subway tunnel with a giant pipe running through it.) Why do such itty-bitty pieces of barely-matter need such a big space to roam?
The first answer is a bit anticlimactic: We started off using the LHC because it was already there. CERN had a previous accelerator (the Large Electron-Positron Collider) that initially occupied the space, and it was that big to accommodate the collisions of (you guessed it!) electrons and positrons. So why was the LEP that size or even built 328 feet (100 meters) underground?
It was built underground for a pretty basic reason: It proved cheaper to simply excavate a tunnel than to buy land and mitigate environmental impacts [source: CERN]. (It also needed to have a bit of a slope to minimize costs resulting from the placement of vertical shafts.) But the reason the LEP had such a broad circumference gets to the heart of why the LHC needs a wide berth, as well: The lady needed a nice set of curves.
The rounded bends of the LHC are necessary for that acceleration that's so important to our particle pals. It all starts with Newton's laws of motion, which says that a particle (or anything, for that matter -- no pun intended) will travel at a constant speed unless acted on by a force. What does this mean? That particle will travel in a straight line at the same speed unless there's something used to accelerate them.
And that "something" is the curve of the circular accelerator. Unlike a linear accelerator -- where the particles travel in a straight line -- a circular accelerator allows particles to get energy each time around [source: The Particle Adventure]. (The huge magnets that steer the protons aren't adding energy, but the electrical field is adding to acceleration.) A circular accelerator will let the protons go around and around, gaining energy, while also allowing for multiple points for the particles to collide -- a linear accelerator, of course, would just have one point of collision, at the very end.
Answering why the LHC is circular might not seem to have anything to do with its size, but it does relate. A smaller racetrack for the protons would mean that they would need to accelerate more to accommodate the sharper curves, and would lose more energy -- and thus the collision wouldn't be as strong [source: Butterworth]. So a large radius is needed to get the particles' energy high enough to both accelerate and create collisions.
And don't think that all the scientists are satisfied with the size of the current LHC. There are serious considerations being made to build a 62-mile (100-kilometer) track that will provide an even more energetic course for particle collisions [source: Pease]. Keep in mind that the higher the energy achieved, the more massive the particles that can be found -- an important way to identify new elusive, heavy particles [source: Reich].
Author's Note: Why is the LHC 27 kilometers in circumference?
Sure, it's kind of off-topic, but I think we all want to know: What would happen if we stumbled into the LHC while the proton beams were working their magic? Nobody's entirely sure, but it's a pretty good guess that you'd have a hole blasted through your body, and perhaps a cone of proton-exploding impact, as well.
- Butterworth, Jon. "Why is the LHC tunnel so big?" The Guardian. June 8, 2012. (July 20, 2014) http://www.theguardian.com/science/life-and-physics/2012/jun/08/why-is-lhc-big
- Enbger, Daniel. "What would happen if you got zapped by the Large Hadron Collider?" Popular Science. Oct. 3, 2013. (July 16, 2014) http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2013-09/fyi-what-would-happen-if-you-got-zapped-large-hadron-collider
- European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN). "LHC: The Guide." (July 20, 2014) http://cds.cern.ch/record/1165534/files/CERN-Brochure-2009-003-Eng.pdf
- European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN). "The Large-Electron Positron Collider." 2014. (July 20, 2014) http://home.web.cern.ch/about/accelerators/large-electron-positron-collider
- Hawking, Stephen. "How to build a time machine." The Daily Mail. April 27, 2010. (July 20, 2014) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1269288/STEPHEN-HAWKING-How-build-time-machine.html
- The Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. "How do we experiment with tiny particles?" The Particle Adventure. (July 20, 2014) http://www.particleadventure.org/accel_adv.html
- LHC Facts. "Linear Accelerator 2." (July 20, 2014) http://www.lhc-facts.ch/index.php?page=linac
- Musser, George. "When the Large Hadron Collider is too small." Scientific American. Sept. 30, 2013. (July 20, 2014) http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/critical-opalescence/2013/09/30/when-the-large-hadron-collider-is-too-small/
- Pease, Roland. "CERN considers building huge physics machine." BBC. Feb. 18, 2014. (July 20, 2014) http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-26250716
- Reich, Eugene Samuel. "Physicists plan to build a bigger LHC." Nature. Nov. 12, 2013. (July 20, 2014) http://www.nature.com/news/physicists-plan-to-build-a-bigger-lhc-1.14149
- Science and Technology Facilities Council. "Large Hadron Collider." Research Councils UK. (July 20, 2014) http://www.stfc.ac.uk/646.aspx