How Drone Strikes Work

Drone Strike Controversy
Drones are touted as a more efficient way of targeting bad guys, but the rate of civilian casualties has sparked worldwide protests.
Drones are touted as a more efficient way of targeting bad guys, but the rate of civilian casualties has sparked worldwide protests.
Ahmad Kamal/Xinhua Press/Corbis

In 2013 President Barack Obama gave a speech justifying the drone program using three main points. First, he argued that terrorists are bad people who will try to kill Americans unless someone stops them. Second, he pointed out that terrorists like to hide in places where local governments have little or no influence, so the United States has to respond instead. Finally, he suggested that drones are the best of many bad options. Traditional air strikes are less accurate and more likely to cause collateral damage. Using Special Operations puts more American lives in danger, and invasions, as we've seen in Iraq and Afghanistan, can be difficult to contain [source: Fisher].

Not everyone agrees with that assessment, though. One of the most common criticisms is drone strikes sometimes kill innocent civilians; indeed, the highest estimates place civilian deaths at 1,125 in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia as of May 2015 [sources: New America, BIJ]. In one such tragic instance in the Waziristan region of Pakistan in April 2015, a drone strike killed two hostages — one American and one Italian [source: Walsh]. The administration counters that while civilian deaths are regrettable, even more would die if the terrorists were allowed to live and carry out their attacks, not just in the United States, but also in the very communities where the drone strikes happen.

The other main criticism involves the legality of the strikes under both U.S. and international law. As we mentioned earlier, the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) gave the president the authority to attack those responsible for the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. But 15 years later, with Osama bin Laden dead and al-Qaida on the run, many question whether the terrorists now killed by drones can really be linked to those original attacks. The administration justifies today's strikes by interpreting the AUMF to include "associated forces," though that phrase doesn't actually appear in the resolution. Perhaps most concerning to critics is that the Obama administration includes U.S. citizens in this group, meaning they can be killed without a trial. That's what happed to New Mexico native Anwar al-Awlaki — and his son, Colorado-born Abdulrahman — in Yemen in 2009 [sources: Global Justice Clinic, Currier].

Finally, numerous questions have come from the international community, including United Nations officials, who argue that drone attacks run afoul of international law. They contend that these rules prohibit killings in areas not recognized as being in an armed conflict. In response, the Obama administration has argued that the strikes are legal because they're carried out in self-defense [source: Bowcott].

Author's Note: How Drone Strikes Work

If there's one issue that demonstrates the complexity of the world's problems, it's drone strikes. Imagine for a minute that you're the one responsible for approving an attack on a suspected terrorist. Killing him could mean you save innocent lives. But it could also mean you take a few, too. Could you do it? No matter what side of this issue you're on, there's not an easy answer. That's what struck me while writing this article: Drone strikes really are just one of many bad options.

Related Articles

More Great Links


  • Abe, Nicola. "Dreams in Infrared: The Woes of an American Drone Operator." Spiegel Online. Dec. 14, 2012. (May 4, 2015)
  • Almasmari, Hakim. "Yemen Says U.S. Drone Struck a Wedding Convoy, Killing 14." CNN. Dec. 13, 2013. (May 3, 2015)
  • Barnes, Julian E. "U.S. Rethinks Secrecy on Drone Program." The Wall Street Journal. May 17, 2012. (May 7, 2015)
  • Beauchamp, Zack. "Viewpoint: Why This Election is About More Than Drones." Think Progress. Oct. 7, 2012. (May 6, 2015)
  • Bowcott, Owen. "Drone Strikes Threaten 50 Years of International Law, Says UN Rapporteur." The Guardian. June 21, 2012. (May 10, 2015)
  • Bumiller, Elisabeth. "A Day Job Waiting for a Kill Shot a World Away." The New York Times. July 29, 2012. (May 5, 2015)
  • Clark, Richard M. "Uninhabited Combat Aerial Vehicles: Airpower by the People, For the People, But Not with the People." Air University Press. August 2000. (May 10, 2015)
  • Currier, Cora. "Everything We Know So Far About Drone Strikes." ProPublica. Feb. 5, 2013. (May 9, 2015)
  • Dawar, Safdar. "U.S. Drones Strike in Pakistan's North Waziristan." The Wall Street Journal. July 10, 2014. (May 5, 2015)
  • Fisher, Max. "Obama's Case for Drones." The Washington Post. May 23, 2013. (May 10, 2015)
  • Garamone, Jim. "From U.S. Civil War to Afghanistan: A Short History of UAVs." United States Department of Defense. April 16, 2002. (May 6, 2015)
  • Global Justice Clinic at New York University School of Law and the Stanford International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic. "Living Under Drones: Death, Injury and Trauma to Civilians from US Drone Practices in Pakistan." 2012. (May 4, 2015)
  • Grossnick, Roy A. "United States Naval Aviation 1910-1995." Naval Historical Center. 1997. (May 9, 2015)
  • Keane, John F. and Stephen S. Carr. "A Brief History of Early Unmanned Aircraft." Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest. 2013 (May 9, 2015)
  • Klaidman, Daniel. "Will Obama End the War on Terror?" Newsweek. Dec. 17, 2012. (May 10, 2015)
  • Matthews, Dylan. "Everything You Need to Know About the Drone Debate, in One FAQ." The Washington Post. March 8, 2013. (May 5, 2015)
  • Miller, Greg. "Brennan Speech is First Obama Acknowledgement of Use of Armed Drones." The Washington Post. April 30, 2012. (May 10, 2015)
  • Miller, Greg and Julie Tate. "U.S. Government's Refusal to Discuss Drone Attacks Comes Under Fire." The Washington Post. April 24, 2015. (May 7, 2015)
  • New America. "Drone Wars Pakistan: Analysis." (May 4, 2015)
  • Overy, Richard. "Ten of the Greatest: Aerial Engagements." The Daily Mail. July 10, 2010. (May 9, 2015)
  • Shane, Scott. "The Moral Case for Drones." The New York Times. July 14, 2012. (May 6, 2015)
  • Sifton, John. "A Brief History of Drones." The Nation. Feb. 7, 2012. (May 9, 2015)
  • Suebsaeng, Asawin. "Drones: Everything You Ever Wanted to Know But Were Always Afraid to Ask." Mother Jones. March 5, 2013. (May 3, 2015)
  • Tate, Karl. "How Unmanned Drone Aircraft Work (Infographic)." Live Science. June 27, 2013. (May 10, 2015)
  • Tenet, George. "Written Statement for the Record of the Director of Central Intelligence Before the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States." March 24, 2004. (May 6, 2015)
  • United States Air Force. "MQ-1B Predator." July 20, 2010. (May 10, 2015)
  • United States Air Force. "MQ-9 Reaper." Aug. 18, 2010. (May 10, 2015)
  • Walsh, Declan. "Drone Strikes on Al Qaeda Are Said to Take Toll on Leadership in Pakistan." The New York Times. April 24, 2015. (May 3, 2015)
  • Zenko, Micah and Emma Welch. "Where the Drones Are." Foreign Policy. May 29, 2012. (May 14, 2015)