It's 1838. Darwin is struggling to unify a growing collection of notes and observations on his still-developing theory. He picks up a copy of Malthus' essay and, after reading how human population grows unchecked, realizes that all organisms have a capacity to over reproduce. A female frog lays thousands of eggs. An oak tree drops millions of acorns in its lifetime. And yet the world isn't overrun with frogs or oak trees. For Darwin, this is a lightning bolt of inspiration. Once he realizes that organisms over reproduce and that some of these offspring are better suited to survive than others, he has the clue he needs to explain how natural selection works.
Darwin and Malthus have been linked in the history books ever since. Over the years, as Darwin's theory has been embraced and widely accepted, Malthus's premise has faced skepticism and out-and-out scorn. His detractors are quick to point out the mistakes he made. One of his biggest was failing to account for the impact of agricultural advances, such as fertilizers, irrigation and mechanization, that have kept food production ahead of population. Malthus also failed to anticipate the impacts of family planning and contraception, which have helped reduce fertility rates. For these reasons, many economists dismiss Malthus as a naive forecaster.
But recently, interest in Malthus and his thoughts on population have experienced a bit of a revival. One reason is recent data from the United Nations suggesting world population will top 9 billion by 2050 [source: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity].
Many experts believe our planet can't support such a large number of people. For example, in its 2008 "Living Planet Report," the conservation organization WWF states that the global footprint of humans already exceeds the world's capacity to regenerate by about 30 percent [source: Hails]. What will happen when the human population exceeds 9 billion? Will more and more of the world succumb to poverty, famine and disease?
Supporters of the Malthusian premise say yes, this is exactly what will happen. Those who oppose the idea believe that technological advances -- some we have yet to conceive -- will enable us to live long and prosper. For better or worse, we won't know who's right for decades.
Related HowStuffWorks Articles
More Great Links
- Baron, David. "Thomas Malthus." NPR Weekend Sunday. June 7, 1998. (Sept. 12, 2010)http://www.npg.org/projects/malthus/npr_story.htm
- Campbell, Neil A. and Jane B. Reece. "Biology." Seventh edition. Benjamin Cummings. 2005.
- Cohen, Joel E. "Human Population Grows Up." Scientific American. September 2005.
- Guralnick, Rob and David Polly. "Thomas Malthus." University of California Museum of Paleontology. (Sept. 12, 2010)http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/history/malthus.html
- Hails, Chris, ed. "Living Planet Report 2008." World Wildlife Fund. WWF International. (Aug. 29, 2010)http://assets.panda.org/downloads/living_planet_report_2008.pdf
- Sachs, Jeffrey D. "The Specter of Malthus Returns." Scientific American. September 2008.
- de Waal, Frans B. M., Filippo Aureli and Peter G. Judge. "Coping with Crowding." Scientific American. May 2000.
- Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. "Sustaining Life on Earth: How the Convention on Biological Diversity Promotes Nature and Human Well-being." April 2000. (Aug. 29, 2010)http://www.cbd.int/convention/guide/
- Thomson, Keith. "1798: Darwin and Malthus." American Scientist. May-June 1998. (Sept. 12, 2010)http://www.americanscientist.org/issues/num2/1798-darwin-and-malthus/2