Prev NEXT  


Do wind turbines kill birds?

Location, Location and Surface Area

Tug Hill.
Frank Whitney/Photographer's Choice/Getty Images
Newer turbines, like those on Tug Hill in New York, have a larger surface area and cause fewer bird deaths.

In the past couple of decades, turbine designs have changed dramatically. Turbine blades are now solid, meaning no lattice structure to attract birds looking to perch. Also, the blades' surface area is much larger, so they don't have to spin as fast to generate power. Slower-moving blades mean fewer bird collisions.

Perhaps the biggest change in wind-farm safety, though, has to do with location. Now, all new turbine proposals are reviewed for ideal, bird-friendly placement. Wind farms cannot be built in migratory pathways, in areas with high bird populations, or in areas with special features that could possibly attract high bird populations in the future. Also, the growing trend toward offshore turbine construction bodes well for birds, since offshore wind farms have fewer bird collisions than land-based farms.

Possibly the greatest indicator that wind turbines are not, in fact, bird-o-matics, is the growing number of endorsements by bird conservation groups. The American Bird Conservancy supports wind power with the caveat that bird-friendly placement and design be primary factors in construction [source: ABC]. The Wisconsin Bird Initiative states that wind turbines have a "low impact" on avian mortality compared to window glass and communication towers [source: WBCI]. And in 2006, the Audubon Society gave its figurative seal of approval to the American Wind Energy Association. The president of the national organization is quoted by Renewable Energy World as stating, "When you look at a wind turbine, you can find the bird carcasses and count them. With a coal-fired power plant, you can't count the carcasses, but it's going to kill a lot more birds" [source: REW].

Of course, zero turbine-related bird deaths would be the best-case scenario, but as far as energy production goes, that seems to be an unrealistic goal. The best we can hope for is smarter placement of wind turbines and more bird-friendly design in order to further reduce the number of bird deaths resulting from one of the best alternative energy sources available right now. Altamont Pass, for its part, is in the process of slowly replacing its turbines with newer models.

For more information on wind energy and birds, fly to the links on the next page.

Last editorial update on Aug 23, 2018 11:18:00 am.

Related Articles

More Great Links


  • Bats and Wind Turbines. American Wind Energy Association.
  • Common Eco-Myth: Wind Turbines Kill Birds. TreeHugger. April 6, 2006.
  • For the Birds: Audubon Society Stands Up in Support of Wind Energy. Renewable Energy World. December 14, 2006.
  • Massive Offshore Wind Turbines Safe for Birds. Technology Review. MIT. February 12, 2007. ­ ­
  • Mortality Threats to Birds: Wind Turbines. American Bird Conservancy.
  • Putting Wind Power's Effect on Birds in Perspective. American Wind Energy Association.
  • Quietly, wind farms spread footprint in U.S. Reuters. May 19, 2008.
  • Wind Power and Birds. Wisconsin Bird Conservation Initiative.
  • Wind turbines taking toll on birds of prey. USAToday. January 4, 2005.