The goal of earthquake-resistant buildings is to preserve life. That means a building that doesn't collapse and allows its inhabitants to escape is considered a success -- even if it ends up being demolished. But what if a building could experience deformation during a quake, then return to its original shape? For some researchers, such as Greg Deierlein of Stanford University and Jerome Hajjar of Northeastern University, that's the future of seismic engineering.
Deierlein and Hajjar have teamed up to develop an innovative technology known as the rocking frame, which consists of three basic components -- steel frames, steel cables and steel fuses. Here's how it works: When an earthquake strikes, the steel frames rock up and down to their heart's content. All of the energy gets directed downward to a fitting that houses several toothlike fuses. The teeth of the fuses gnash together and may even fail, but the frame itself remains intact. Once the shaking has stopped, the steel cables in the frame pull the building back into an upright position. Workers then inspect the fuses and replace any that are damaged. The result is a building that can be reoccupied quickly after an earthquake.
Another innovation is something that's been dubbed the seismic invisibility cloak, suggesting a building could be made transparent to the surface waves produced by an earthquake. To accomplish this, engineers would bury a series of up to 100 concentric plastic rings beneath the foundation of a building. When waves encounter the rings, they enter and then become compressed as they are forced into a bottleneck. The waves basically zip by, just beneath the building's foundation, and exit the rings on the other side, where they resume their original speed and amplitude.
Interestingly, much of the future of seismic engineering involves looking back, not forward. That's because retrofitting old buildings with improved designs and materials is just as important as constructing new buildings from scratch. Engineers have found that adding base-isolation systems to structures is both feasible and economically attractive. According to the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program, more than 200 buildings in the United States, including many city government and fire and emergency buildings, now feature isolation systems. After the 1989 Loma Prieta quake alone, engineers retrofitted several buildings, including the city halls of San Francisco, Oakland and Los Angeles. The earthquake-resistant structures in these buildings will most certainly face a test in the form of a serious seismic event. The only question is when and to what extent.
- The Applied Technology Council (ATC) and the Structural Engineers Association of California (SEAOC). "Briefing Paper 1: Building Safety and Earthquakes." (Sept. 2, 2011) www.atcouncil.org/pdfs/bp1a.pdf
- Barras, Colin. "Invisibility cloaks could hide buildings from quakes." New Scientist. June 26, 2009. (Sept. 2, 2011) http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17378
- BBC. "Earthquake hits San Francisco." On This Day: October 17, 1989. (Sept. 2, 2011) http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/october/17/newsid_2491000/2491211.stm
- Eddy, Nathan. "Taipei 101's 730-Ton Tuned Mass Damper." Popular Mechanics. July 19, 2005. (Sept. 2, 2011) http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/gadgets/news/1612252
- Fischetti, Mark. Sock Absorbed. Scientific American. October 2004.
- Introducing and Demonstrating Earthquake Engineering Research in Schools. "Strengthening Buildings for Earthquakes." University of Bristol: Bristol Challenge. (Sept. 2, 2011) http://www.ideers.bris.ac.uk/resistant/strengthening.html
- Irvine, Tom. "Transamerica Pyramid Design." Vibration Data. Feb. 8, 2002. (Sept. 2, 2011) http://www.vibrationdata.com/earthquakes/Pyramid.htm
- Living Steel. "Earthquake and Earthquake-resistant Buildings." Structural Safety Tutorials. (Sept. 2, 2011) http://www.livingsteel.org/content/view/75/126/1/6/
- Moseman, Andrew. "The Tech To Make Buildings Earthquake -- and Tsunami -- Resistant."March 11, 2011. (Sept. 2, 2011) http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/engineering/architecture/earthquake-and-tsunami-resistant-building-tech-5382936
- Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER). "Basics of Earthquake Resistant Design." (Sept. 2, 2011) http://mceer.buffalo.edu/infoservice/reference_services/basicsEQdesign.asp
- Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER). "Buildings That Use Base Isolation Technology." (Sept. 2, 2011) http://mceer.buffalo.edu/infoservice/reference_services/baseIsolation1.asp
- Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER). "How Buildings Respond to Earthquakes." (Sept. 2, 2011) http://mceer.buffalo.edu/infoservice/reference_services/buildingRespondEQ.asp
- Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER). "How Earthquakes Affect Buildings." (Sept. 2, 2011) http://mceer.buffalo.edu/infoservice/reference_services/EQaffectBuilding.asp
- National Information Centre of Earthquake Engineering. "Guidelines for Earthquake Resistant Non-Engineered Construction, Chapter 3: General Concepts of Earthquake Resisting Design." (Sept. 2, 2011) www.nicee.org/iaee/E_Chapter3.pdf
- Our Amazing Planet. "Japan's Biggest Earthquakes." Land: Earthquakes. (Sept. 2, 2011) http://www.ouramazingplanet.com/japan-earthquakes-top-10-110408-1356/
- PBS. "Hagia Sophia." Building Big. (Sept. 2, 2011) http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/buildingbig/wonder/structure/hagia_sophia.html
- Petersen, M.D. et al. "United States National Seismic Hazard Maps: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2008–3018." (Sept. 2, 2011) http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2008/3018/
- Structural Engineers Association of Northern California. "San Francisco City Hall." Celebrating Earthquake Safety. (Sept. 2, 2011) http://www.celebratingeqsafety.com/sf-city-hall.html
- Ward, Logan. "The Earthquake-Resilient Building." Popular Mechanics. Sept. 30, 2010. (Sept. 2, 2011) http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/engineering/architecture/earthquake-proof-building-that-is-built-to-collapse