How LifeStraw Works

By: Martha Barksdale & Kate Kershner

October 2010: Residents at the Croix Des Bouquets camp north of Port Au Prince, Haiti receiving training to use LifeStraw Family. See more green science pictures.
October 2010: Residents at the Croix Des Bouquets camp north of Port Au Prince, Haiti receiving training to use LifeStraw Family. See more green science pictures.
© Adam Stoltman/Corbis

When those of us in the developed world think of a global threat, we usually imagine some shadowy terrorist organization or insurgency in politically unstable areas. We generally don't give the sparkling glass of water next to us the side eye.

But according to the United Nations, dirty water is killing more people than war -- or violence in general [source: Pflanz]. And keep in mind that for many people simply getting water is a struggle [source: UN Water]. According to the 2010 World Health Organization and UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP), 780 million people do not use improved sources of drinking water [source: JMP 2012]. (The JMP defines an improved source as "one that, through technological intervention, increases the likelihood that it provides safe water" [source: JMP 2012].) To make matters worse, purifying water to make it drinkable can be a time-consuming, expensive process.


The challenge is to create a safe, effective way to treat the drinking water of the poorest nations -- without an enormous financial burden. Swiss company Vestergaard Frandsen believes that its product, LifeStraw -- as well as a unique distribution method -- may be a solution. In the next few pages, we'll explore how LifeStraw works, as well as other methods to get clean water to those who need it.

But as you read, keep in mind that unclean water is no small burden on the global population. About half of the world's poor suffer from diseases caused by the water they consume, and approximately 6,000 people die each day from illnesses that access to clean water could have prevented [source: United Nations]. Cholera, typhoid and enteric fever are all deadly illnesses caused by the consumption of contaminated water. Bacterial or viral contaminants in the water can cause diarrhea and vomiting in humans by releasing toxins into the intestines. Globally, diarrhea is the leading cause of illness and death, and 88 percent of those deaths are due to lack of sanitation facilities, combined with limited access to water for hygiene and unsafe water [source: UN Water].

It's a complicated issue, but -- surprisingly -- the technology to fight it might be quite simple.

LifeStraw Technology

Water enters the LifeStraw apparatus (bottom of picture), hollow fibers trap pathogens while clean water passes through (see inset), and filtered water is sucked up by the user at the top.
Water enters the LifeStraw apparatus (bottom of picture), hollow fibers trap pathogens while clean water passes through (see inset), and filtered water is sucked up by the user at the top.
Image courtesy Vestergaard Frandsen

LifeStraw is a tube about 9.25 inches (23.5 centimeters) long and about an inch (2.5 centimeters) around [source: Wilhelm]. The outer shell of the unit is made of a durable plastic, with a string attached so users can wear it around their necks. To use it, a person simply sticks the LifeStraw directly into the water source and drinks as he or she would from a straw.

The first iteration of LifeStraw used iodine to kill bacteria, but the 2012 version contains no chemicals. Instead, the product incorporates mechanical filtration. When you suck on your LifeStraw, water is forced through hollow fibers, which contain pores less than 0.2 microns across -- thus, a microfiltration device. Any dirt, bacteria or parasites are trapped in the fibers, while the clean water passes through. When you're done drinking, you simply blow air out the straw to clear the filter. You can down a quart of water in eight minutes using the LifeStraw.


Vestergaard Frandsen says a personal LifeStraw unit should be able to purify about 1,000 liters (264 gallons) of water -- 2.7 liters (0.7 gallons) a day -- meaning that it will last a year before it needs to be replaced. There are no replacement parts; users must get a new unit each year.

LifeStraw Family is a larger unit that can purify enough water for several people at once. This higher-capacity product can handle a family of five for three years, or roughly 18,000 liters (4,755 gallons), according to the company. The product consists of a blue bucket with a prefilter insert, a long plastic tube and a filter cartridge with a tap attached to draw out the water. No electricity or battery power is required. Gravity guides water through a series of filters. The user pours water into the prefilter and bucket at the top of the unit. The water then moves down the tube and runs through the same type of hollow fiber technology that the personal LifeStraw uses, but these pores are actually 0.02 microns across, which makes it an ultrafiltration device. (It also means the family unit can filter out viruses, while the personal one can't.) The user can then pour the newly purified water from the tap. The person can clean the filter by closing the tap and pressing a red squeeze bulb to release the collected residue and can use a rag to wipe the prefilter bucket. LifeStraw Family can filter about 9-12 liters (2.4 to 3.2 gallons) of water per hour [source: Wilhelm].

On the next page, we'll look at what LifeStraw can and can't do.

LifeStraw in Action

Both the family and personal models of LifeStraw eliminate sediment, bacteria and parasites from drinking water. The personal filter can stop particles measuring 0.2 microns -- small enough to filter tiny bacteria and parasites. Both models have filters that eliminate 99.9999 percent of the bacteria and 99.9 percent of the parasites present in the water. (As we said, only the family version can filter out viruses.) It's important to note that both versions don't remove heavy chemicals or salt, so don't go sticking your LifeStraw in arsenic-laced water and expect refreshment.

While some people hail LifeStraw and other personal water filters as the answer to the developing world's water woes, others say they're only a temporary fix. Paul Hetherington, spokesperson for the British charity WaterAid, feels the real problem is the distance that some people in remote areas have to travel to a water source, which can be as far as 20 kilometers (12.4 miles) round-trip. He also says LifeStraw is too expensive for the average person in these countries, should they have to procure the units themselves. (They don't currently.) He believes that education on good hygiene and the establishment of a reliable source of clean water in the village is a more viable solution [source: BBC News].


Let's read on to look into some ways LifeStraw is reaching a wide population, as well as its unique -- and occasionally controversial -- distribution method.

LifeStraw Distribution

A man waits to use a public restroom in New Delhi, India. Twenty five percent of New Delhi's 16 million residents have no access to running water.
A man waits to use a public restroom in New Delhi, India. Twenty five percent of New Delhi's 16 million residents have no access to running water.
Robert Nickelsberg/Getty Images

The U.N. wants to reduce the number of people without access to sustainable water by half by 2015. While digging new wells and putting in water treatment plants are viable solutions, some experts feel that personal filtration systems are a more successful means of creating clean water. For example, studies have shown that filtration is the most effective way to prevent diarrhea. Treating water at the household level has been proven to be more than twice as effective in preventing diarrhea as treating water at the source [source: UNICEF]. In light of this information, many humanitarian and disaster relief organizations focus on point-of-use water treatment technology. These groups can purchase the personal LifeStraw for a ballpark figure of $6.50 each and the family units at $25. If you're a hiker or camper in the United States and want one for your own use, you'll pay about $20-$25 for personal LifeStraw. Prices, of course, will vary according to when and where you buy the products.

But it's Vestergaard Frandsen's newest way of distributing LifeStraw (through its Carbon for Water program) that has gained quite a bit of attention. The company is actually giving away its product to Kenyans: In September 2011, The New York Times reported that more than a million LifeStraw Family units were already donated in Kenya that year, and the company has made units available to 4.5 million Kenyans so far [sources: Hoffman, Wilhelm].


But the company is definitely benefiting -- economically -- as well, as it participates in a lucrative carbon offset program. By allowing Kenyans to filter their water (as opposed to burning wood to boil it), Vestergaard Frandsen receives carbon credits. Those credits are then sold -- at a profit -- to companies who are looking for a way to offset their own pollution or costs. And thus, the company makes money on its donation [source: Katayama].

This doesn't sit well with everyone. Some point out that the recipients of LifeStraws aren't usually boiling their water, so a carbon offset wouldn't apply [source: Starr]. Then, of course, there's the fact that Vestergaard Frandsen is making a profit when selling the carbon credits, while completing a clever marketing move by putting LifeStraws in many Kenyan homes -- LifeStraws that will someday need to be replaced, presumably.

Household Water Treatment -- What Are the Options?

As filtration goes, LifeStraw is an extremely effective product (and when it's being donated to those in need, a very cost-effective one as well). But UNICEF points out some other personal filtration or water sanitation technologies that also could work in developing nations.

One is good old chlorine. In the right dose, it can kill 99.99 percent of enteric, or intestinal, pathogens (but not Cryptosporidium and Mycobacterium species) [source: UNICEF]. Another cool technology is ceramic water filters, which use an idea similar to LifeStraw. Ceramic naturally has the same small pores -- 0.2 microns -- that can filter out bacteria and protozoa [source: Brown]. They also are sometimes treated with silver to stop microbial growth (which also might make it more effective to kill microbes in general). A 2007 U.N. study of ceramic water filters declared them one of the "best available options for household water filters" [source: Brown]. Then there are solar filters, which -- much like bringing water to a boil through fuel -- heats the water enough to kill dangerous pathogens. The SODIS (solar water disinfection) method is simple as can be: Put your water in PET plastic or glass bottles, and let the sun heat them for six hours (or up to two days, depending on the weather). The process will eliminate viruses, bacteria and parasites [source: SODIS].


After discussing the merits of various point-of-consumption filters -- that is, filters that are used right before drinking -- you might be wondering if water sanitation should be done on a larger scale. Point-of-source interventions (where the water is decontaminated at the source) are also a possibility. But by and large, studies have shown that point-of-consumption is more effective, both from a public health and a cost standpoint [source: UNICEF].

As you can see, bringing clean water to the poorest parts of the globe can be a tricky business -- perhaps with the emphasis on "business." But read on for lots more information about LifeStraw and other options to make water safe for all.

Lots More Information

Author's Note: How LifeStraw Works

I don't envy those who are in the business of trying to make the world a better place, while keeping an eye on their bottom line. No matter how much good they do, they're going to get dinged for making money off the enterprise. And indeed, there seems little doubt that Vestergaard Frandsen has a stellar product in LifeStraw. But when the CEO is putting $30 million of his own money into the project, it does give one pause. Thirty million dollars will provide for a lot of LifeStraws, sure. But that money is not a donation to bring clean water to folks; it's an investment in a company that hopes to make a profit by bringing clean water to folks.

Related Articles

  • BBC News. "New Straw To Kill Disease As You Drink." 5/4/2006. (12/20/2008).
  • Brown, Joel; Sobsey, Mark and Proum, Sonya. "Use of ceramic water filters in Cambodia." UNICEF. August 2007. (Jan. 30, 2013)
  • The Carter Center. "Guinea Worm Eradication Program." (12/22/2008)
  • Directors of Health Promotion and Education. "Guinea Worm Disease." (7/10/2009)
  • Dunn, Collin. "Sponsor a LifeStraw Family Water Filter With Project H Design." 4/25/08. (12/22/08)
  • "LifeStraw Personal Water Filter." 2012. (Jan. 30, 2013)
  • Hoffman, Jascha. "LifeStraw saves those without access to clean drinking water." The New York Times. Sept. 26, 2011. (Jan. 30, 2013)
  • Inderscience Publishers. "Cheap, Clean Drinking Water Purified Through Nanotechnology." ScienceDaily, 2/26/ 2008. (12/22/2008)­ /releases/2008/02/080220094656.htm
  • Katayama, Lisa. "Fighting water-borne disease in Africa, and making millions in the process." Fast Company. April 25, 2011. (Jan. 30, 2013)
  • Lakehaven Utility District. "Three Ways to Purify Water." (12/20/2008)
  • McCutcheon, Stacey and Denend, Lyn. "LifeStraw Carbon for Water." Global Health Innovation Insight Series, Stanford. 2012. (Jan. 30, 2013)
  • Medgadget: Internet Journal of Emerging Medical Technologies. "LifeStraw." 5/23/2005. (12/22/2008)
  • Pflanz, Mike. "World Water Day." Christian Science Monitor. March 22, 2010. (Jan. 30, 2013)
  • Rosenberg, Tina. "Clean water at no cost?" The New York Times. Nov. 15, 2010. (Jan. 30, 2013)
  • Sobsey, Mark D. "Managing water in the home." World Health Organization. 2002. (Jan. 30, 2013)
  • SODIS. "How does it work?" Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology. 2013. (Jan. 30, 2013)
  • Starr, Kevin. "Thirty million dollars, a little bit of carbon, and a lot of hot air." Stanford Social Innovation Review. June 16, 2011. (Jan. 30, 2013)
  • Time. "Best Inventions 2005: Healthy Options. Clear Water Revival." 11/13/2005. (12/22/2008),8599,1129522-2,00.html
  • UNICEF. "Promotion of household water treatment and safe storage in UNICEF wash programs." UNICEF. Jan. 2008. (Jan. 30, 2013)
  • United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. "World Water Assessment Program."(12/20/2008).
  • United Nations Water. "Water Statistics." United Nations. (Jan. 30, 2013)
  • Vestergaard Frandsen. "LifeStraw Brochure." Vestergaard Frandsen. (Jan. 30, 2013)
  • Vestergaard Frandsen. "LifeStraw." (12/16/2008)
  • Vestergaard Frandsen. "LifeStraw." Vestergaard Frandsen. (Jan. 30, 2013)
  • WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation. "Progress on sanitation and drinking-water." World Health Organization and UNICEF. 2010. (Jan. 30, 2013)
  • WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation. "Progress on sanitation and drinking-water." World Health Organization and UNICEF. 2012. (Jan. 30, 2013)
  • Wilhelm, Elisabeth, new media specialist, Vestergaard-Frandsen. Personal correspondence. January 2013.