Although carbon capture and storage may seem like a miracle solution, it's not without concern or controversy. To begin, it's important to remember that carbon capture and storage (CCS) is not a license to continue emitting CO2 into the atmosphere. We need to use CCS in addition to other emission-reduction efforts. However, CCS provides a way to clean up our existing power plants.
Opponents of CCS believe that, while it may be viable, the focus is all wrong. They argue that we should be coming up with ways to wean ourselves off fossil fuels instead of spending time and money on ways to continue using fossil fuels. According to the environmental group Greenpeace, widespread deployment of CCS isn't even possible until at least 2030.
Another drawback? Current CCS technologies actually require a lot of energy to implement and run -- up to 40 percent of a power station's capacity [source: Greenpeace]. Additionally, if we transport that captured CO2 by truck or ship, those vehicles will require fuel. And, the burning of fossil fuels is what got us into this predicament in the first place.
Creating a CCS-enabled power plant also requires a lot of money. For example, the United States has its own CCS project in the works. FutureGen hopes to build the first coal-fueled zero-emissions power plant. Its goal is to create a power plant that runs on coal but stores carbon emissions underground. The plant would power 150,000 homes and generate 275 megawatts of electricity [source: FutureGen]. Private partnerships and federal monies helped support the project. But President Bush pulled support when projected costs topped $1.8 billion. The government had already sunk $50 million into the project when it pulled its backing [source: Wald]. FutureGen continues to seek private and federal funding today.
The biggest concern with CCS, though, is the environmental risk. What happens if the carbon dioxide leaks out underground? We can't really answer this question. Because the process is so new, we don't know its long-term effects. Proponents, however, point to the Sleipner gas field, which has been in operation for more than 10 years without any detectable underground leakage.
What if the carbon dioxide leaks out in the ocean? We do have a little bit of knowledge on this one. In 1986, a natural volcanic eruption of carbon dioxide from a lake in Cameroon killed nearly 2,000 people. They died of asphyxiation from being in close vicinity to the release of CO2. These numbers don't even take into account the death toll of marine life that called the lake home [source: BBC].
Another effect of excess CO2 in the water is increased acidity. The ocean actually absorbs CO2 from the atmosphere -- a phenomenon known as carbon sink. Scientists have recently discovered that some oceans aren't absorbing as much CO2 as they did in the past. The Southern Ocean, in particular, no longer soaks up as much carbon dioxide, a fact that alarms scientists. The excess CO2 from human emissions appears to be staying on the surface of the oceans instead of sinking. And the more CO2 an ocean surface absorbs, the more acidic it becomes [source: Rincon]. Higher water acidity adversely affects marine life. For example, it reduces the amount of vital calcium carbonate marine creatures need to build their shells.
There are still many questions about whether carbon capture and storage will help to alleviate the greenhouse effect and slow climate change. But one thing's for certain: carbon dioxide emissions are a worldwide problem.
For more information about carbon, dig your way into the links below.
More Great Links
- Adam, David. "Deep-sea carbon storage must be tested, says leading scientist." Guardian. June 18, 2008. (June 20, 2008) http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/jun/18/carboncapturestorage.carbonemissions
- Allen, Paddy. "Carbon Capture Technologies." Guardian.co.uk. June 12, 2008. (July 2, 2008) http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/interactive/2008/jun/12/carbon.capture
- BBC News. "On This Day - 1986: Hundreds Gassed in Cameroon Lake Disaster." August 1986. (June 25, 2008) http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/august/21/newsid_3380000/3380803.stm
- Bernstein, Lenny et al. "Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report." Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. November 2007. (June 23, 2008) http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/syr/ar4_syr_spm.pdf
- Broecker, Walter. "Deep Divisions." Guardian. June 18, 2008. (June 20, 2008) http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/jun/18/carboncaptureandstorage
- Carbon Capture & Sequestration. "Frequently Asked Questions." 2008. (June 23, 2008) http://www.ccs-education.net/faqs.html
- CO2 Sink. "About the Project." 2008. (June 25, 2008) http://www.co2sink.org/geninfo/theproject.htm
- Eilperin, Juliet. "Growing Acidity of Oceans May Kill Corals." Washington Post. July 5, 2006. (June 20, 2008) http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/04/AR2006070400772.html
- Georgia Institute of Technology. "Carbon Capture Strategy Could Lead to Emission-Free Cars." Feb. 11, 2008. (June 23, 2008) http://www.gatech.edu/newsroom/release.html?id=1707
- Green Facts. "How do CO2 capture technologies work?" Greenfacts.org. Aug. 31, 2007. (June 23, 2008) http://www.greenfacts.org/en/co2-capture-storage/l-2/3-capture-co2.htm#1
- Herzog, Howard and Golomb, Dan. "Carbon Capture and Storage from Fossil Fuel Use." Encyclopedia of Energy. 2004. (July 2, 2008) http://sequestration.mit.edu/pdf/enclyclopedia_of_energy_article.pdf
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. "Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage." 2005. (July 2, 2008) http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/srccs.htm
- Meisel, Lindsay. "From Synthetic Trees to Carbon Sponges: An Interview with Scientist Klaus Lackner." The Breakthrough Institute. March 18, 2008. (June 23, 2008) http://www.thebreakthrough.org/blog/2008/03/from_synthetic_trees_to_carbon.shtml
- National Energy Technology Laboratory. "Carbon Sequester - CO2 capture." 2008. (June 18, 2008) http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/carbon_seq/core_rd/co2capture.html
- Parfomak, Paul W. and Folger, Peter. "CRS Report for Congress - Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Pipelines for Carbon Sequestration: Emerging Policy Issues." April 19, 2007. (July 2, 2008) http://ncseonline.org/NLE/CRSreports/07May/RL33971.pdf
- Rincon, Paul. "Polar ocean 'soaking up less CO2." BBC News. May 17, 2007. (June 25, 2008) http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6665147.stm
- Rochon, Emily. "False Hope: Why carbon capture and storage won't save the environment." Greenpeace.org. May 2008. (June 20, 2008) http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/usa/press-center/reports4/ false-hope-why-carbon-capture/executive-summary-false-hope.pdf
- Romm, Joseph. "Post-combustion carbon dioxide capture." Grist. Aug. 17, 2007. (June 18, 2008) http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2007/8/17/101337/509
- ScienceDaily. "Carbon Capture And Storage To Combat Global Warming Examined." June 12, 2007. (June 24, 2008) http://www.sciencedaily.com /releases/2007/06/070611153957.htm
- Solomon, Semere. "Security of CO2 storage in Norway." Bellona. Sept. 10, 2007. (June 25, 2008) http://www.bellona.org/factsheets/1191928198.67
- United Nations Environment Programme. "Introduction to Climate Change." 2008. (June 23, 2008) http://www.grida.no/climate/vital/01.htm
- United States Environmental Protection Agency. "Global Greenhouse Gas Data." Feb. 25, 2008. (June 25, 2008) http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/emissions/globalghg.html
- United States Geological Survey. "Photo glossary of volcano terms." Nov. 16, 2001. (June 25, 2008) http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/Products/Pglossary/basalt.html
- Wilderness Society. "Climate Change Facts: A Primer on Carbon Cycling." Feb. 27, 2008. (June 18, 2008) http://www.wilderness.org/Library/Documents/upload/primer_carbon_cycling.pdf