For more than 40 years, scientists have tried to figure out what's causing large parts of Canada, particularly the Hudson Bay region, to be "missing" gravity. In other words, gravity in the Hudson Bay area and surrounding regions is lower than it is in other parts of the world, a phenomenon first identified in the 1960s when the Earth's global gravity fields were being charted.
Two theories have been proposed to account for this anomaly. But before we go over them, it's important to first consider what creates gravity. At a basic level, gravity is proportional to mass. So when the mass of an area is somehow made smaller, gravity is made smaller. Gravity can vary on different parts of the Earth. Although we usually think of it as a ball, the Earth actually bulges at the Equator and gets flatter at the poles due to its rotation. The Earth's mass is not spread out proportionally, and it can shift position over time. So scientists proposed two theories to explain how the mass of the Hudson Bay area had decreased and contributed to the area's lower gravity.
One theory centers on a process known as convection occurring in the Earth's mantle. The mantle is a layer of molten rock called magma and exists between 60 and 124 miles (100 to 200 km) below the surface of the Earth . Magma is extremely hot and constantly whirling and shifting, rising and falling, to create convection currents. Convection drags the Earth's continental plates down, which decreases the mass in that area and decreases the gravity.
A new theory to account for the Hudson Bay area's missing gravity concerns the Laurentide Ice Sheet, which covered much of present-day Canada and the northern United States. This ice sheet was almost 2 miles (3.2 km) thick in most sections, and in two areas of Hudson Bay, it was 2.3 miles (3.7 km) thick. It was also very heavy and weighed down the Earth. Over a period of 10,000 years, the Laurentide Ice Sheet melted, finally disappearing 10,000 years ago. It left a deep indentation in the Earth.
To get a better idea of what happened, think about what happens when you lightly press your finger into the surface of a cake or a piece of really springy bread. Some of it moves to the sides and there's an indentation. But when you remove your finger, it bounces back to normal. A similar thing happened with the Laurentide Ice Sheet, the theory proposes -- except the Earth isn't so much "bouncing" back as it is rebounding very slowly (less than half an inch per year). In the meantime, the area around Hudson Bay has less mass because some of the Earth has been pushed to the sides by the ice sheet. Less mass means less gravity.
So which theory is correct? It turns out that both of them are. Convection and the ice sheet's rebound effect are both causing some of the decrease in gravity around Hudson Bay. First, we'll consider the ice sheet theory.
To calculate the impact of the Laurentide Ice Sheet, scientists at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics used data gathered by the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellites between April 2002 and April 2006. The GRACE satellites are highly sophisticated machines, orbiting about 310 miles (500 km) above the Earth and 137 miles (220 km) apart. The satellites can measure distances down to a micron, so they can detect minor gravitational variations. When the lead satellite flies over the Hudson Bay area, the decrease in gravity causes the satellite to move slightly away from the Earth and from its sister satellite. This shift in distance is detected by the satellites and used to calculate the change in gravity. Any shifts detected can also be used to create maps of gravitational fields.
The GRACE data allowed scientists to create topographical maps approximating what Hudson Bay looked like during the last ice age, when it was covered by the Laurentide Ice Sheet. These maps revealed some interesting features about the area, including two bulging areas on the western and eastern sides of Hudson Bay where the ice was much thicker than the rest of the sheet. Gravity is now lower there than in other parts of the gravity-depleted bay.
Another important finding came from the GRACE data: It turns out that the ice sheet theory only accounts for 25 percent to 45 percent of the gravitational variation around Hudson Bay and the surrounding area. Subtracting the "rebound effect" from the area's gravitational signal, scientists have determined that the remaining 55 percent to 75 percent of gravitational variation is likely due to convection.
The Hudson Bay area is going to have less gravity for a long time. It's estimated that the Earth has to rebound more than 650 feet to get back to its original position, which should take about 5,000 years. But the rebound effect is still visible. Although sea levels are rising around the world, the sea level along Hudson Bay's coast is dropping as the land continues to recover from the weight of the Laurentide Ice Sheet.
While the mystery surrounding Canada's gravitational anomalies has been put to rest, the study has wider implications. Scientists involved in the Harvard-Smithsonian Center study were amazed that they were able to see how the Earth looked 20,000 years ago. And by isolating the influence of the ice sheet's rebound effect, researchers better understand how convection affects gravity and how continents change over time. Finally, the GRACE satellites have provided scientists with data on many ice sheets and glaciers. By examining climate change that took place thousands of years ago, scientists may gain a better understanding of how global warming and rising sea levels are affecting our planet today and what impact they will have on our future.
For more information about Canada's missing gravity, see the links below.
- How does gravity work?
- How Special Relativity Works
- How Weightlessness Works
- What if there were no gravity on Earth?
- How Zero-gravity Flights Work
- What does gravity have to do with the big bang?
- What secrets of gravity have been uncovered in the last 50 years?
- What are the four fundamental forces of nature?
More Great Links
- Bryner, Jeanna. "Weird Gravity in Canada Blamed on Hefty Glaciers." LiveScience. May 10, 2007. http://www.livescience.com/environment/070510_odd_gravity.html
- Fountain, Henry. "How a Vast Sheet of Ice Put The Squeeze on Earth (and Its Gravity)." The New York Times. May 15, 2007. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/15/science/15obse1.html ?_r=1&ref=science&oref=slogin
- Munro, Margaret. "Ancient glaciers still reshaping Canada, satellites show." CanWest News Service. May 13, 2007. http://www.canada.com/montrealgazette/news/insight/story.html? id=3d733281-d348-40e5-85a5-e7f7e67acd11
- Robertson, Eugene. "The Interior of the Earth." U.S. Geological Survey. June 26, 2001. http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/interior/
- Than, Ker. "Scientists to study gash on Atlantic seafloor." LiveScience. MSNBC.com. March 1, 2007. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17407745/
- Walton, Dawn. "Canada's odd low gravity a relic of the ice age." Globe and Mail. May 11, 2007. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/LAC.20070511. GRAVITY11/TPStory/Environment
- Young, Kelly. "Satellites solve mystery of low gravity over Canada." NewScientist.com. May 10, 2007. http://space.newscientist.com/article/dn11826-satellites- solve-mystery-of-low-gravity-over-canada.html
- "Gravity Anomaly Solved." Science Friday. May 14, 2007. http://www.sciencefriday.com/news/051407/news0514071.html